Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals More

Online First

January 16, 2020

Extended essay
Prioritarian principles for digital health in low resource settings

Niall Winters, Sridhar Venkatapuram, Anne Geniets, Emma Wynne-Bannister

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105468
Original research
Institutional conflict of interest: attempting to crack the deferiprone mystery

Arthur Schafer

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105498

January 10, 2020

Original research
Process of risk assessment by research ethics committees: foundations, shortcomings and open questions

Pranab Rudra, Christian Lenk

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105595

January 07, 2020

Original research
Uncovering social structures and informational prejudices to reduce inequity in delivery and uptake of new molecular technologies

Sara Filoche, Peter Stone, Fiona Cram, Sondra Bacharach, Anthony Dowell, Dianne Sika-Paotonu, Angela Beard, Judy Ormandy, Christina Buchanan, Michelle Thunders, Kevin Dew

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105734
Original research
How should we think about clinical data ownership?

Angela Ballantyne

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105340
Original research
How should the ‘privilege’ in therapeutic privilege be conceived when considering the decision-making process for patients with borderline capacity?

Sumytra Menon, Vikki Entwistle, Alastair Vincent Campbell, Johannes J M van Delden

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105792

December 31, 2019

Current controversy
Medically assisted gender affirmation: when children and parents disagree

Samuel Dubin, Megan Lane, Shane Morrison, Asa Radix, Uri Belkind, Christian Vercler, David Inwards-Breland

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105567

December 24, 2019

Original research
Pain versus suffering: a distinction currently without a difference

Charlotte Mary Duffee

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105902

December 23, 2019

Original research
Experiences with counselling to people who wish to be able to self-determine the timing and manner of one’s own end of life: a qualitative in-depth interview study

Martijn Hagens, Marianne C Snijdewind, Kirsten Evenblij, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen, H Roeline W Pasman

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105564

December 18, 2019

Clinical ethics
Use of cadavers to train surgeons: what are the ethical issues?

Hannah James

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105873
Current controversy
Prescribing medical cannabis: ethical considerations for primary care providers

Aaron Glickman, Dominic Sisti

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105759

December 17, 2019

Original research
A matter of time: grappling with everyday ethical tensions at the confluence between policy and practice in a psychiatric unit

Rossio Motta-Ochoa, Raphael Lencucha, Jiameng Xu, Melissa Park

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105423

December 13, 2019

Response
Continuing conversations about abortion and deprivation

Anna Christensen

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105908
Original research
Imperfect by design: the problematic ethics of surgical training

Connor Brenna, Sunit Das

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105837

December 09, 2019

Extended essay
Ethics of socially assistive robots in aged-care settings: a socio-historical contextualisation

Tijs Vandemeulebroucke, Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé, Chris Gastmans

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105615

December 06, 2019

Response
The case against meta-consent: not only do Ploug and Holm not answer it, they make it even stronger

Neil C Manson

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105955
Extended essay
Conscientious objection and moral distress: a relational ethics case study of MAiD in Canada

Mary Kathleen Deutscher Heilman, Tracy J Trothen

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105855

December 05, 2019

Current controversy
First prosecution of a Dutch doctor since the Euthanasia Act of 2002: what does the verdict mean?

Eva Constance Alida Asscher, Suzanne van de Vathorst

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105877
Original research
Protecting health privacy even when privacy is lost

T.J. Kasperbauer

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105880

December 03, 2019

Original research
Physician, heal thyself: a cross-sectional survey of doctors’ personal prescribing habits

Yvonne Hartnett, Clive Drakeford, Lisa Dunne, Declan M McLoughlin, Noel Kennedy

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105064
Original research
Should professional interpreters be able to conscientiously object in healthcare settings?

Nathan Emmerich, Christine Phillips

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105767

November 28, 2019

Current controversy
Ethical concerns with online direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical companies

Henry Curtis, Joseph Milner

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105776

November 27, 2019

Original research
Consent in children’s intensive care: the voices of the parents of critically ill children and those caring for them

Phoebe Aubugeau-Williams, Joe Brierley

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105716

November 20, 2019

Extended essay
On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare

Thomas Grote, Philipp Berens

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105586

November 15, 2019

Extended essay
Reconceptualising risk–benefit analyses: the case of HIV cure research

Robert Steel

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105548
Original research
What does ‘quality’ add? Towards an ethics of healthcare improvement

Alan Cribb, Vikki Entwistle, Polly Mitchell

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105635

November 12, 2019

Response
Why public funding for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) might still be wrong: a response to Bunnik and colleagues

Dagmar Schmitz

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105885
Clinical ethics
Patients’ and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence

Shona Kalkman, Johannes van Delden, Amitava Banerjee, Benoît Tyl, Menno Mostert, Ghislaine van Thiel

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105651
Original research
Autonomy, voluntariness and assisted dying

Ben Colburn

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105720

November 08, 2019

Feature article
Gestation, equality and freedom: ectogenesis as a political perspective
Free

Giulia Cavaliere

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105691
Original research
Have ignorance and abuse of authorship criteria decreased over the past 15 years?

Evelyne Decullier, Hervé Maisonneuve

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105737
Original research
Paediatric xenotransplantation clinical trials and the right to withdraw

Daniel J Hurst, Luz A Padilla, Wendy Walters, James M Hunter, David K C Cooper, Devin M Eckhoff, David Cleveland, Wayne Paris

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105668

November 07, 2019

Response
Responding to Simkulet’s objections to the two tragedies argument

Henrik Friberg-Fernros

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105770

November 06, 2019

Response
‘Serious’ factor—a relevant starting point for further debate: a response

Erika Kleiderman, Vardit Ravitsky, Bartha Maria Knoppers

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105832

October 30, 2019

Original research
Are the irreversibly comatose still here? The destruction of brains and the persistence of persons

Lukas J Meier

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105618
Response
Some notes on the nature and limits of posthumous rights: a response to Persad

Sean Aas

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105833

October 29, 2019

Original research
Arrogance of ‘but all you need is a good index finger’: A narrative ethics exploration of lack of universal funding of PSA screening in Canada

Jeff Nisker

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105742
Response
Just caring: screening needs limits

Leonard Michael Fleck

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105884
Response
Artificial wombs, birth and ‘birth’: a response to Romanis

Nick Colgrove

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105845
Response
Old consent and new developments: health professionals should ask and not presume

Rachel Horton, Angela Fenwick, Anneke M Lucassen

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105868
Response
Taking one for the team: a reiteration on the role of self-blame after medical error

Daniel W Tigard

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105846

October 24, 2019

Response
Blame and its consequences for healthcare professionals: response to Tigard

Elizabeth A Duthie, Ian C Fischer, Richard M Frankel

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105525
Response
‘Serious’ science: a response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers

Satvir Kalsi

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105764

October 19, 2019

Response
Abortion and the Epicurean challenge

Karl Ekendahl

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105771

October 17, 2019

Response
Is the ‘serious’ factor in germline modification really relevant? A response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers

Iñigo De Miguel Beriain

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105744

September 28, 2019

Original research
The ethics of testing and research of manufactured organs on brain-dead/recently deceased subjects

Brendan Parent, Bruce Gelb, Stephen Latham, Ariane Lewis, Laura L Kimberly, Arthur L Caplan NYU Medical Ethics Working Group on Research on the Recently Deceased

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105674
Extended essay
Education versus screening: the use of capacity to consent tools in psychiatric genomics

Camillia Kong, Mehret Efrem, Megan Campbell

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105396

September 19, 2019

Original research
Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise

William Simkulet

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105676
Extended essay
Will you give my kidney back? Organ restitution in living-related kidney transplantation: ethical analyses

Eisuke Nakazawa, Keiichiro Yamamoto, Aru Akabayashi, Margie H Shaw, Richard A Demme, Akira Akabayashi

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105507

September 16, 2019

Response
Understanding choice, pressure and markets in kidneys

Luke Semrau

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105781

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

Online First

January 16, 2020

January 10, 2020

January 07, 2020

December 31, 2019

December 24, 2019

December 23, 2019

December 18, 2019

December 17, 2019

December 13, 2019

December 09, 2019

December 06, 2019

December 05, 2019

December 03, 2019

November 28, 2019

November 27, 2019

November 20, 2019

November 15, 2019

November 12, 2019

November 08, 2019

November 07, 2019

November 06, 2019

October 30, 2019

October 29, 2019

October 24, 2019

October 19, 2019

October 17, 2019

September 28, 2019

September 19, 2019

September 16, 2019

Pages