Skip to main content
We use cookies to improve our service and to tailor our content and advertising to you.
More info
You can manage your cookie settings via your browser at any time. To learn more about how we use cookies, please see our
cookies policy
.
Subscribe
Log In
More
Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts
Username
*
Password
*
Forgot your log in details?
Register a new account?
Forgot
your user name or password?
Basket
Search
More
Search for this keyword
Advanced search
Latest content
Current issue
Archive
Authors
About
Search for this keyword
Advanced search
Close
More
Main menu
Latest content
Current issue
Archive
Authors
About
Subscribe
Log in
More
Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts
Username
*
Password
*
Forgot your log in details?
Register a new account?
Forgot
your user name or password?
BMJ Journals
More
You are here
Home
Online First
Online First
Email Alert
Online First
May 15, 2019
Original research
Pressure in dealing with requests for euthanasia or assisted suicide.
Experiences of general practitioners
Marike E
de Boer
,
Marja F I A
Depla
,
Marjolein
den Breejen
,
Pauline
Slottje
,
Bregje D
Onwuteaka-Philipsen
,
Cees M P M
Hertogh
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2018-105120
Response
Against the nihilism of ‘legal age change’: response to Räsänen
Toni C
Saad
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2019-105475
Original research
Doctors’ perceptions of how resource limitations relate to futility in end-of-life decision making: a qualitative analysis
Eliana
Close
,
Ben P
White
,
Lindy
Willmott
,
Cindy
Gallois
,
Malcolm
Parker
,
Nicholas
Graves
,
Sarah
Winch
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2018-105199
Original research
Waiting for a miracle or best medical practice? End-of-life medical ethical dilemmas in Bahrain
Sayed
Alwadaei
,
Barrak
Almoosawi
,
Hani
Humaidan
,
Susan
Dovey
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2018-105297
Response
Defending the two tragedies argument: a response to Simkulet
Henrik
Friberg-Fernros
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2019-105489
April 27, 2019
Commentary
Delineating the role of penile transplantation when traditional male circumcisions go wrong in South Africa
Stuart
Rennie
,
Keymanthri
Moodley
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2019-105414
April 25, 2019
Extended essay
Why it is unethical to charge migrant women for pregnancy care in the National Health Service
Arianne
Shahvisi
,
Fionnuala
Finnerty
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2018-105224
April 24, 2019
Response
Murder, abortion, contraception, greenhouse gas emissions and the deprivation of non-discernible and non-existent people: a reply to Marquis and Christensen
Hugh V
McLachlan
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2019-105470
April 15, 2019
Viewpoint
Gatekeeping hormone replacement therapy for transgender patients is dehumanising
Florence
Ashley
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2018-105293
March 14, 2019
Response
The need for feasible compromises on conscientious objection: response to Card
Aaron J
Ancell
,
Walter
Sinnott-Armstrong
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2019-105425
Original research
Moral case for legal age change
Joona
Räsänen
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2018-105294
March 12, 2019
Response
The moral argument for heritable genome editing requires an inappropriately deterministic view of genetics
Rachel
Horton
,
Anneke M
Lucassen
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2019-105390
March 07, 2019
Viewpoint
Smoking and hospitalisation: harnessing medical ethics and harm reduction
Kimberly
Sue
,
Dinah
Applewhite
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2018-105065
March 02, 2019
Student essay
Is it just semantics? Medical students and their ‘first patients’
Natalie
Cohen
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2017-104306
February 28, 2019
Response
Goldilocks and the two principles. A response to Gyngell
et al
Peter
Mills
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2019-105395
February 25, 2019
Brief report
Uterus transplantation in women who are genetically XY
Amani
Sampson
,
Laura L.
Kimberly
,
Kara N.
Goldman
,
David L.
Keefe
,
Gwendolyn P.
Quinn
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2018-105222
February 18, 2019
Response
What are considered ‘good facts’?
Akira
Akabayashi
,
Eisuke
Nakazawa
,
Nancy S
Jecker
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2018-105333
February 16, 2019
Response
Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to Christensen
Bruce P.
Blackshaw
,
Daniel
Rodger
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2018-105267
February 08, 2019
Response
In response to an argument against penile transplantation
André
Van der Merwe
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2018-104795
January 24, 2019
Feature article
Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report
Christopher
Gyngell
,
Hilary
Bowman-Smart
,
Julian
Savulescu
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2018-105084
January 11, 2019
Response
A rebuttal to Akabayashi and colleagues’ criticisms of the iPSC stock project
Misao
Fujita
,
Keiichi
Tabuchi
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2018-105248
September 04, 2018
Original research
Forced caesareans: applying ordinary standards to an extraordinary case
Hafez
Ismaili M’hamdi
,
Inez
de Beaufort
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2018-104828
June 13, 2018
Reproductive ethics
A surrogate’s secrets are(n’t) safe with me: patient confidentiality in the care of a gestational surrogate
Claire
Horner
,
Paul
Burcher
doi:
10.1136/medethics-2017-104518
