Article Text
Abstract
In this article, I explore the ethical dimensions of same-sex reproduction achieved through epigenome editing—an innovative and transformative technique. For the first time, I analyse the potential normativity of this disruptive approach for reproductive purposes, focusing on its implications for lesbian couples seeking genetically related offspring. Epigenome editing offers a compelling solution to the complex ethical challenges posed by traditional gene editing, as it sidesteps genome modifications and potential long-term genetic consequences. The focus of this article is to systematically analyse the bioethical issues related to the use of epigenome editing for same-sex reproduction. I critically assess the ethical acceptability of epigenome editing with reproductive purposes from multiple angles, considering harm perspectives, the comparison of ethical issues related to gene and epigenome editing, and feminist theories. This analysis reveals that epigenome editing emerges as an ethically acceptable means for lesbian couples to have genetically related children. Moreover, the experiments of a reproductive use of epigenome editing discussed in this article transcend bioethics, shedding light on the broader societal implications of same-sex reproduction. It challenges established notions of biological reproduction and prompts a reevaluation of how we define the human embryo, while poses some issues in the context of gender self-identification and family structures. In a world that increasingly values inclusivity and diversity, this article aims to reveal a progressive pathway for reproductive medicine and bioethics, as well as underscores the need for further philosophical research in this emerging and fertile domain.
- Reproductive Medicine
- Gene Transfer Techniques
Data availability statement
No data are available.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
No data are available.
Footnotes
Twitter @villalbaciencia
Contributors AV is the sole author and corresponding one. AV is responsible for the overall content as the guarantor.
Funding This study was funded by Fundació Víctor Grífols i Lucas (BEC-2022-05).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Comparative ethical evaluation of epigenome editing and genome editing in medicine: first steps and future directions
- The meaning of synthetic gametes for gay and lesbian people and bioethics too
- Using stem cell-derived gametes for same-sex reproduction: an alternative scenario
- Scientists call for moratorium on editing heritable genes
- Guerrilla eugenics: gene drives in heritable human genome editing
- Gene editing for inflammatory disorders
- Scientists call for moratorium on clinical use of human germline editing
- Science fiction authors’ perspectives on human genetic engineering
- Ethics briefings
- Artificial gametes: new paths to parenthood?