Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵Author footnote i Note an ambiguity in the concept of ‘self-medication.’ It ultimately appears Flanigan is arguing for a right to access and use prescription-grade drugs for medical or non-medical purposes—take the case of the student who wants to use Adderall not to treat a recognised medical condition but to be more competitive, or the analogy with elective cosmetic surgery. Her argument is, perhaps, really an argument for a right to access whatever resources are available for purposes of self-improvement—however one conceives of ‘improvement’ to oneself.
-
↵ii O'Neill, Onora, Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics, Cambridge, 2002.
-
↵iii Arguably, not all forms of suicide qualify as self-destruction in the relevant way.
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Commentaries
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Prescription requirements: a reply to Taylor, Martin and Eyal
- Three arguments against prescription requirements
- Capturing and promoting the autonomy of capacitous vulnerable adults
- Direct-to-consumer genomics on the scales of autonomy
- Killing people: what Kant could have said about suicide and euthanasia but did not
- Is respect for autonomy defensible?
- Which strings attached: ethical considerations for selecting appropriate conditionalities in conditional cash transfer programmes
- Authenticity and autonomy in deep-brain stimulation
- Dignity: not such a useless concept
- Reconciling informed consent with prescription drug requirements