Article info
Commentaries
Commentary on ‘Three arguments against prescription requirements’
- Correspondence to Dr Adrienne Martin, Department of Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania, 429 s 36 st, Philadelphia, PA 19146, USA; adrm{at}sas.upenn.edu
Citation
Commentary on ‘Three arguments against prescription requirements’
Publication history
- Received May 28, 2012
- Accepted June 1, 2012
- First published July 26, 2012.
Online issue publication
September 25, 2012
Article Versions
- Previous version (26 July 2012).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Prescription requirements: a reply to Taylor, Martin and Eyal
- Three arguments against prescription requirements
- Capturing and promoting the autonomy of capacitous vulnerable adults
- Direct-to-consumer genomics on the scales of autonomy
- Killing people: what Kant could have said about suicide and euthanasia but did not
- Is respect for autonomy defensible?
- Which strings attached: ethical considerations for selecting appropriate conditionalities in conditional cash transfer programmes
- Authenticity and autonomy in deep-brain stimulation
- Dignity: not such a useless concept
- Reconciling informed consent with prescription drug requirements