The aim of the present study was to explore the use and understanding of the concepts ‘placebo’ and ‘placebo effect’ in 12 empirical studies that have addressed the prescription of placebos by doctors in clinical practice. There were great differences in the general methodology and in the definitions (or lack of any definition) of the basic concepts in these 12 studies. Therefore, the results reflect different things. They tell us a little about the use of ‘pure placebos’, more about the use of ‘impure placebos’, but most of all, they tell us about the conceptual confusion in this area.
- Philosophy of medicine
- learning disability
- complementary medicine
- paediatric ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Deliberate use of placebos in clinical practice: what we really know
- Clinical use of placebo treatments may undermine the trust of patients: a response to Gold and Lichtenberg
- Patients’ attitudes about the use of placebo treatments: telephone survey
- The ethics of the placebo in clinical practice revisited
- Patient attitudes about the clinical use of placebo: qualitative perspectives from a telephone survey
- Physician perspectives on placebo ethics
- Rethinking the placebo effect
- Placebo effects and the molecular biological components involved
- Prescribing “placebo treatments”: results of national survey of US internists and rheumatologists
- The placebo effect: powerful, powerless or redundant?