Article Text
PDFResponse
TREs are still not about trust
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @rjmilne
Contributors MG provided substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, and wrote the initial and subsequent drafts. RM and MS provided substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, and critically revised the initial draft for important intellectual content. PF provided substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work. All authors have given final approval of the published version.
Funding This study was funded Wellcome Trust (108413/A/15/D, 203132/Z/16/Z).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Trust and the Goldacre Review: why trusted research environments are not about trust
- Machine learning models, trusted research environments and UK health data: ensuring a safe and beneficial future for AI development in healthcare
- Multiple modes of data sharing can facilitate secondary use of sensitive health data for research
- Verification and trust in healthcare
- Trusted research environments are definitely about trust
- Navigating data governance associated with real-world data for public benefit: an overview in the UK and future considerations
- Data for sale: trust, confidence and sharing health data with commercial companies
- Linked electronic health records for research on a nationwide cohort of more than 54 million people in England: data resource
- Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK
- Big health data: the need to earn public trust