Article info
PDFResponse
TREs are still not about trust
- Correspondence to Dr Mackenzie Graham, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK; mackenzie.graham{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
TREs are still not about trust
Publication history
- Received February 20, 2023
- Accepted February 27, 2023
- First published March 14, 2023.
Online issue publication
October 18, 2023
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Trust and the Goldacre Review: why trusted research environments are not about trust
- Machine learning models, trusted research environments and UK health data: ensuring a safe and beneficial future for AI development in healthcare
- Multiple modes of data sharing can facilitate secondary use of sensitive health data for research
- Verification and trust in healthcare
- Trusted research environments are definitely about trust
- Navigating data governance associated with real-world data for public benefit: an overview in the UK and future considerations
- Data for sale: trust, confidence and sharing health data with commercial companies
- Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK
- Linked electronic health records for research on a nationwide cohort of more than 54 million people in England: data resource
- Big health data: the need to earn public trust