Introduction Currently, The nature and scope of Clinical Ethics Protocols (CEPs) in Madrid (Spain) are not well understood.
Objectives The main objective is to describe the features of ‘guideline/recommendation’ type CEPs that have been or are being developed by existing Clinical Ethics Committees (CECs) in Madrid. Secondary objectives include characterisation of those CECs that have been the most prolific in reference to CEP creation and implementation and identification of any trends in future CEP development.
Methods We collected CEPs produced and in process by CECs accredited in the public hospitals in Madrid, Spain, from 1996 to 2008.
Results CECs developed 30 CEPs, with 10 more in process. The most common topic is refusal of treatment (seven CEPs developed; two in process). If CEPs addressing terminal illness, Do-Not-Resuscitate orders and advance directives are placed into a separate ‘ethical problems at the end of life’ category, this CEP subject emerges as the most common (eight developed; four in process). There is a relationship between the age of the CEC and the development of CEPs (the oldest CECs have developed more CEPs). CECs now seem to be more likely to engage in CEP development.
Conclusions The CECs in Madrid, Spain, have developed a significant number of CEPs (30 in total and 10 in process) and there is a trend towards continued development. The most frequent topics are ethical problems at the end of life and refusal of treatment by the patient.
- Clinical Ethics
- Ethics Committees/Consultation
- Managed Care
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Snapshots of five clinical ethics committees in the UK
- The attitudes of neonatal professionals towards end-of-life decision-making for dying infants in Taiwan
- The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the Patient Self-Determination Act
- Development of clinical ethics committees
- Importance of systematic deliberation and stakeholder presence: a national study of clinical ethics committees
- “Allow natural death” versus “do not resuscitate”: three words that can change a life
- Evaluation of end of life care in cancer patients at a teaching hospital in Japan
- Consultation activities of clinical ethics committees in the United Kingdom: an empirical study and wake-up call
- Clinical ethics, information, and communication: review of 31 cases from a clinical ethics committee
- Physicians’ confidence in discussing do not resuscitate orders with patients and surrogates