Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
It seems that all is not plain sailing when navigating the homepages of journals to identify their policies towards editorial conflicts of interest (COI), and the editors' actual declarations. So say Smith et al in their accompanying paper searching the ‘top ten’ medical journals (by impact factor).1
In the last decade, the risks to scientific integrity of authorial and reviewer COIs have come under increasing scrutiny. Could editors be the last bastion of privilege, or does this small study merely expose poor website design? Editors hold a powerful position as gatekeepers to knowledge. It would be shameful if any of them departed from strictly intellectual grounds for accepting or rejecting a submission, and particularly shameful if decisions were perverted by financial interest. Thus, readers are entitled to know if …
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Improving biomedical journals’ ethical policies: the case of research misconduct
- A comparison of journal instructions regarding institutional review board approval and conflict-of-interest disclosure between 1995 and 2005
- Paying lip service to publication ethics: scientific publishing practices and the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World
- A cross-sectional examination of conflict-of-interest disclosures of physician-authors publishing in high-impact US medical journals
- Accessibility and transparency of editor conflicts of interest policy instruments in medical journals
- Mandatory disclosure of financial interests of journals and editors
- Reporting of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest by authors of systematic reviews: a methodological survey
- Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey
- Covid-19: How independent were the US and British vaccine advisory committees?
- The gender and geography of publishing: a review of sex/gender reporting and author representation in leading general medical and global health journals