Article info
PDFPaper
Research ethics
The “how” and “whys” of research: life scientists’ views of accountability
- Correspondence to Mildred Cho, 701 Welch Road, Suite A1105, Palo Alto, CA 94034, USA; micho{at}stanford.edu
Citation
The “how” and “whys” of research: life scientists’ views of accountability
Publication history
- Received June 22, 2009
- Accepted July 24, 2009
- First published November 30, 2009.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics. All rights reserved.
Other content recommended for you
- Developing a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum for professionalism and scientific integrity training for biomedical graduate students
- Problem-based learning for professionalism and scientific integrity training of biomedical graduate students: process evaluation
- How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers
- Ludwig Cancer Research Announces $540 Million Gift
- News
- Understanding the relative valuation of research impact: a best–worst scaling experiment of the general public and biomedical and health researchers
- Factors affecting African postdoctoral researcher capacity development within ‘learn-by-doing’ international research partnerships: findings from the ‘Partnership for Increasing the Impact of Vector Control (PIIVeC)’
- GRANTS AND CONTRACTS
- Genetics services in a social, ethical and policy context: a collaboration between consumers and providers
- New-media arts-based public engagement projects could reshape the future of the generative biology