Article info
PDFControversy
Unanswered questions and ethical issues concerning US biodefence research
- Correspondence to Dr W Schumm, School of Family Studies and Human Services, Kansas State University, Justin Hall, 1700 Anderson Avenue, Manhattan, KS 66506-1403, USA; schumm{at}ksu.edu
Citation
Unanswered questions and ethical issues concerning US biodefence research
Publication history
- Received April 15, 2008
- Revised October 28, 2008
- Accepted January 14, 2009
- First published September 30, 2009.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics. All rights reserved.
Other content recommended for you
- Determination of serum IgG antibodies to Bacillus anthracis protective antigen in environmental sampling workers using a fluorescent covalent microsphere immunoassay
- Bacillus anthracis
- Bioterrorism and compulsory vaccination
- Bioterrorism and compulsory vaccination: United States continues vaccinating to keep troops healthy
- Anthrax and the US media
- What's new in the other general journals
- IDF’s anthrax vaccine trial “violated Helsinki Convention”
- Bioterrorism and compulsory vaccination: Arguments for current vaccines are based on inadequate support for older vaccines
- Fears over anthrax vaccination driving away US reservists
- Biological warfare and bioterrorism