Article Text
Symposium on evidence based medicine
Current epistemological problems in evidence based medicine
Abstract
Evidence based medicine has been a topic of considerable controversy in medical and health care circles over its short lifetime, because of the claims made by its exponents about the criteria used to assess the evidence for or against the effectiveness of medical interventions. The central epistemological debates underpinning the debates about evidence based medicine are reviewed by this paper, and some areas are suggested where further work remains to be done. In particular, further work is needed on the theory of evidence and inference; causation and correlation; clinical judgment and collective knowledge; the structure of medical theory; and the nature of clinical effectiveness.
- Evidence based medicine
- epistemology
- philosophy of medicine
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- False dichotomies: EBM, clinical freedom, and the art of medicine
- Who cares? The lost legacy of Archie Cochrane
- What is nature capable of? Evidence, ontology and speculative medical humanities
- Early impact of the DREAMS partnership on young women’s knowledge of their HIV status: causal analysis of population-based surveys in Kenya and South Africa
- On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare
- Introduction to the symposium: what evidence based medicine is and what it is not
- When to act on the evidence
- An introductory course in philosophy of medicine
- Randomised controlled trials in medical AI: ethical considerations
- “They just don’t get it!” When family disagrees with expert opinion