Article Text

PDF
Afterword: returning to philosophical foundations in research ethics
  1. Nir Eyal
  1. Correspondence to Professor Nir Eyal, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 651 Huntington Ave., FXB Building, Boston, MA 02115, USA; neyal{at}hsph.harvard.edu

Abstract

This is an afterword to the JME symposium on the benefit/risk ratio challenge in clinical research, and the case of HIV cure. It notes implications of the symposium for research ethics in general.

  • HIV Infection and AIDS
  • Research Ethics
  • Ethics

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding This work was funded by NIAID grants 1 R01 AI114617-01A1 and 1 R56 AI114617-01, both titled ‘HIV cure studies: risk, risk perception, and ethics’. The study sponsor had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data; in the writing of the report and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles