Article info
PDFAfterword
Afterword: returning to philosophical foundations in research ethics
- Correspondence to Professor Nir Eyal, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 651 Huntington Ave., FXB Building, Boston, MA 02115, USA; neyal{at}hsph.harvard.edu
Citation
Afterword: returning to philosophical foundations in research ethics
Publication history
- Received February 1, 2016
- Accepted February 8, 2016
- First published June 27, 2016.
Online issue publication
January 25, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (25 January 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- How to keep high-risk studies ethical: classifying candidate solutions
- Ethics of treatment interruption trials in HIV cure research: addressing the conundrum of risk/benefit assessment
- Ethics of vaccine refusal
- Human infection challenge studies in endemic settings and/or low-income and middle-income countries: key points of ethical consensus and controversy
- The Gettier Problem in informed consent
- Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust
- The benefit/risk ratio challenge in clinical research, and the case of HIV cure: an introduction
- Nudge me, help my baby: on other-regarding nudges
- The morality of risks in research: reflections on Kumar
- Streamlining the Clinical Research Enterprise