Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Response
HIV and the right not to know: a reply to replies
Citation
HIV and the right not to know: a reply to replies
Publication history
- Accepted December 1, 2015
- First published December 29, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- HIV and the right not to know
- Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- Ethical implications of HIV self-testing
- Medical ethics for children: applying the four principles to paediatrics
- Consent for anaesthesia
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- First among equals? Adaptive preferences and the limits of autonomy in medical ethics
- The ethics of non-consensual HIV testing are not substantively different from the ethics of overriding the right not to know a test result
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics