Article Text
PDFClinical ethics
Response
HIV and the right not to know: a reply to replies
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Clinical ethics
- Clinical ethics
- Clinical ethics
- Clinical ethics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- HIV and the right not to know
- Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- Ethical implications of HIV self-testing
- Medical ethics for children: applying the four principles to paediatrics
- Consent for anaesthesia
- First among equals? Adaptive preferences and the limits of autonomy in medical ethics
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- The ethics of non-consensual HIV testing are not substantively different from the ethics of overriding the right not to know a test result
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics