Advance directives for withholding life-saving treatment are controversial for dementia patients whose previously expressed wishes conflict with their currently expressed desires. To illustrate this ethical dilemma, McMahan conceives a hypothetical case in which an intellectually proud creative woman signs an advance directive stipulating her refusal to receive life-saving treatment if she contracts a fatal condition with dementia. However, when she develops dementia and forgets this advance directive, she contracts pneumonia and now expresses a desire to live. In response to such dilemmas, scholars like Norman Cantor have defended the moral authority of advance directives by giving credence to one’s prior competent wishes over one’s current incompetent preferences. I argue that their arguments, which are rooted in the principle of respect for autonomy, operate under ableist assumptions about incompetent persons and exclude other important features of respect. I propose an ethics of care model as an alternative moral approach that reconceptualises respect as a matter of caring about people’s contemporaneous interests, even if they are not competently conceived. It fosters the virtues of care by encouraging healthcare providers to recognise dementia patients as legitimate narrative agents capable of authoring their own evolving life story. I argue that the ethics of care model not only provides an ethical defence of the creative woman’s current incompetent desire to live despite her advance directive, but also vindicates our moral intuitions about what it means to demonstrate respect to dementia patients.
- Advance Directives
- Philosophy- Medical
Data availability statement
No data are available.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Advance euthanasia directives and the Dutch prosecution
- Euthanasia in persons with advanced dementia: a dignity-enhancing care approach
- Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research
- Advance euthanasia directives: a controversial case and its ethical implications
- AEDs are problematic, but Mrs A is a misleading case
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- First prosecution of a Dutch doctor since the Euthanasia Act of 2002: what does the verdict mean?
- Tom Buller on the principle of precedent autonomy and the relation between critical and experiential interests
- The role of advance euthanasia directives as an aid to communication and shared decision-making in dementia
- Respect for autonomy: deciding what is good for oneself