Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Balancing rules in postmortem sperm donation
  1. Guido Pennings
  1. Philosophy, Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium
  1. Correspondence to Dr Guido Pennings, Bioethics Institute Ghent, Universiteit Gent, Gent 9000, Belgium; guido.pennings{at}ugent.be

Abstract

Postmortem sperm donation implies the acceptance of a very low sperm quality threshold. This threshold has two important consequences: recipients will have to submit to burdensome and expensive in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and many more living donors will be accepted, thus making postmortem donors largely superfluous. Given these strong arguments against the use of postmortem collected sperm, a good alternative to enlarge the donor pool would be men who stored sperm for self-use and no longer have the intention to use it.

  • cryobanking of sperm
  • ova or embryos
  • donation/procurement of organs/tissues
  • artificial insemination and surrogacy

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors GP provided the argument and wrote the paper.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

Other content recommended for you