Journal of Medical Ethics: 45 (5)

The concise argument

The biobank consent debate: Why ‘meta-consent’ is not the solution? (1 October, 2018)
Neil C Manson
The biobank consent debate: why ‘meta-consent’ is still the solution! (14 March, 2019)
Thomas Ploug, Soren Holm
Informed consent for functional MRI research on comatose patients following severe brain injury: balancing the social benefits of research against patient autonomy (25 February, 2019)
Tommaso Bruni, Mackenzie Graham, Loretta Norton, Teneille Gofton, Adrian M Owen, Charles Weijer
The Two tragedies argument (22 February, 2019)
William Simkulet
Original research: Canadian neurosurgeons’ views on medical assistance in dying (MAID): a cross-sectional survey of Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS) members (12 March, 2019)
Alwalaa Althagafi, Chris Ekong, Brian W Wheelock, Richard Moulton, Peter Gorman, Kesh Reddy, Sean Christie, Ian Fleetwood, Sean Barry
We don’t need unilateral DNRs: taking informed non-dissent one step further (6 March, 2019)
Diego Real de Asúa, Katarina Lee, Peter Koch, Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, Trevor Bibler
Differential payment to research participants in the same study: an ethical analysis (7 March, 2019)
Govind Persad, Holly Fernandez Lynch, Emily Largent

Obesity, equity and choice (30 October, 2018)
Timothy M Wilkinson
Equity and preventive regulations (22 February, 2019)
Elizabeth Fenton
Should the deceased be listed as authors? (1 March, 2019)
Gert Helgesson, William Bülow, Stefan Eriksson, Tove E Godskesen
Ethics of crisis sedation: questions of performance and consent (20 April, 2019)
Nathan Emmerich, Bert Gordijn

In response to Ballantyne and Schaefer’s ‘Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research’ (7 January, 2019)
Nilay Hepgul, Katherine E Sleeman, Alice M Firth, Anna Johnston, James T H Teo, William Bernal, Richard J B Dobson, Irene J Higginson
Taxonomy of justifications for consent waivers: When and why are public views relevant? (12 March, 2019)
Angela Ballantyne, G Owen Schaefer