Article info
PDFAuthor meets critics: response
Human dignity: a response to Camosy and Huxtable
- Correspondence to Dr Charles Foster, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6HG, UK; Charles.Foster{at}gtc.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Human dignity: a response to Camosy and Huxtable
Publication history
- Received July 10, 2015
- Accepted August 13, 2015
- First published September 28, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Bioethics and multiculturalism: nuancing the discussion
- The Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court regarding assisted suicide: a template for pluralistic states?
- Canadian French and English newspapers’ portrayals of physicians’ role and medical assistance in dying (MAiD) from 1972 to 2016: a qualitative textual analysis
- Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of “human dignity” in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- Medical Assistance in Dying at a paediatric hospital
- Ethics of limb disposal: dignity and the medical waste stockpiling scandal
- Personalism and boosting organ ResERVOirs: a consideration of euthanasia by removal of vital organs in the Canadian context
- Human rights and bioethics
- Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers
- Words matter: ‘enduring intolerable suffering’ and the provider-side peril of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada