Article info
PDFCommentaries
The perils of post-persons
- Correspondence to Dr Robert Sparrow, Faculty of Arts, School of Philosophy and Bioethics, School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia; Robert.Sparrow{at}monash.edu
Citation
The perils of post-persons
Publication history
- Received September 28, 2012
- Accepted October 2, 2012
- First published November 5, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- What moral work can Nussbaum’s account of human dignity do in the context of dementia care?
- Genetic Enhancement, Post-persons, and Moral Status: Author reply to commentaries
- The ethical justification for the use of non-human primates in research: the Weatherall report revisited
- The biomedical enhancement of moral status
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Driven to extinction? The ethics of eradicating mosquitoes with gene-drive technologies