Article info
PDFOriginal Article
What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- Correspondence to: Mr B Gogarty, Centre for Law & Genetics, Law Faculty, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252–89, Hobart, Tas 7001, Tasmania, Australia; brendan.gogarty{at}utas.edu.au
Citation
What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
Publication history
- Accepted June 26, 2002
- Revised May 20, 2002
- First published April 1, 2003.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2003 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Cell phoney: human cloning after Quintavalle
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- Just another reproductive technology? The ethics of human reproductive cloning as an experimental medical procedure
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?
- The moral status of the embryo post-Dolly
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- Emotional reactions to human reproductive cloning
- Embryonic stem cells: the disagreement debate and embryonic stem cell research in Israel