Article info
PDFResearch Article
Reaching targets in the national cervical screening programme: are current practices unethical?
Citation
Reaching targets in the national cervical screening programme: are current practices unethical?
Publication history
- First published June 1, 1998.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Smoking cessation strategy in the national cervical cancer screening program (SUCCESS): study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised trial and process evaluation in Dutch general practice
- Utilisation of preventative health check-ups in the UK: findings from individual-level repeated cross-sectional data from 1992 to 2008
- Examining the information needed for acceptance of deintensified screening programmes: qualitative focus groups about cervical screening in Australia
- Understanding facilitators and barriers to follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screening examination among women living in remote areas of Romania: a qualitative study protocol
- Uptake of medical devices approved by NICE
- Psychosocial outcomes of three triage methods for the management of borderline abnormal cervical smears: an open randomised trial
- Impact of replacing cytology with human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening on the prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis: a modelling study
- How do women feel about their cervical cytology samples being used for research?
- Prevalence of cervical disease at age 20 after immunisation with bivalent HPV vaccine at age 12-13 in Scotland: retrospective population study
- Debates about cervical screening: an historical overview