Article Text
Abstract
In response to the paper by Keown and Jochemsen in which the latest empirical data concerning euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions in the Netherlands is discussed, this paper discusses three points. The use of euthanasia in cases in which palliative care was a viable alternative may be taken as proof of a slippery slope. However, it could also be interpreted as an indication of a shift towards more autonomy-based end-of-life decisions. The cases of non-voluntary euthanasia are a serious problem in the Netherlands and they are only rarely justifiable. However, they do not prove the existence of a slippery slope. Persuading the physician to bring euthanasia cases to the knowledge of the authorities is a problem of any euthanasia policy. The Dutch notification procedure has recently been changed to reduce the underreporting of cases. However, many questions remain.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- Research Article
- Research Article
- Research Article
Other content recommended for you
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. An Argument Against Legislation
- Passive euthanasia
- Mr Marty’s muddle: a superficial and selective case for euthanasia in Europe
- Euthanasia embedded in palliative care. Responses to essentialistic criticisms of the Belgian model of integral end-of-life care
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
- The debate about physician assistance in dying: 40 years of unrivalled progress in medical ethics?
- Of dilemmas and tensions: a qualitative study of palliative care physicians’ positions regarding voluntary active euthanasia in Quebec, Canada
- Euthanasia: above ground, below ground
- Development of palliative care and legalisation of euthanasia: antagonism or synergy?