Psychiatric diagnosis as an ethical problem

J Med Ethics. 1985 Sep;11(3):132-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.11.3.132.

Abstract

Psychiatrists diagnose mental illness in patients against a climate of opinion in which the value of diagnosis is questioned and non-medical formulations of the problems of psychiatric patients are put forward. Nevertheless the classic diagnostic terminology shows no sign of disappearing. The patients may find that a psychiatric diagnostic label is a stigma and has bad consequences. They may also object to standard methods of treatment. Given this situation the right of the patient to a full explanation of the diagnosis and the rationale of the treatment offered seems to be incontrovertible. If this information were given to patients it would, in addition, help them to make sense out of their often puzzling experiences and indicate that fellow sufferers existed.

KIE: Shackle argues that the harmful effects of psychiatric diagnosis, such as social stigmatization and possible loss of freedom, obligate clinicians to minimize the harm done to patients even when mental illness is correctly diagnosed. One way of achieving this goal is to discuss fully with patients the details of their diagnosis in language that they can understand. In so doing, psychiatrists may enable patients to acquire a conceptual framework with which to make sense of their illness, satisfy their cognitive needs, reduce their sense of isolation, and provide them with a route to restoring their mental health.

MeSH terms

  • Ethics, Medical*
  • Humans
  • Mental Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Mentally Ill Persons*
  • Professional-Patient Relations
  • Psychiatry*
  • Risk Assessment*
  • Social Perception