Review Article
The Use of Racial, Ethnic, and Ancestral Categories in Human Genetics Research

https://doi.org/10.1086/491747Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

The global dispersal of anatomically modern humans over the past 100,000 years has produced patterns of phenotypic variation that have exerted—and continue to exert—powerful influences on the lives of individuals and the experiences of groups. The recency of our common ancestry and continued gene flow among populations have resulted in less genetic differentiation among geographically distributed human populations than is observed in many other mammalian species. Nevertheless, differences in appearance have contributed to the development of ideas about “race” and “ethnicity” that often include the belief that significant inherited differences distinguish humans. The use of racial, ethnic, and ancestral categories in genetics research can imply that group differences arise directly through differing allele frequencies, with little influence from socially mediated mechanisms. At the same time, careful investigations of the biological, environmental, social, and psychological attributes associated with these categories will be an essential component of cross-disciplinary research into the origins, prevention, and treatment of common diseases, including those diseases that differ in prevalence among groups.

Cited by (0)

This article is in the public domain, and no copyright is claimed. Address for correspondence and reprints: Steve Olson, 7609 Sebago Road, Bethesda, MD 20817. E-mail: [email protected]

*

The Race, Ethnicity, and Genetics Working Group of the National Human Genome Research Institute includes Kate Berg, Vence Bonham, Joy Boyer, Larry Brody, Lisa Brooks, Francis Collins, Alan Guttmacher, Jean McEwen, Max Muenke, Steve Olson, Vivian Ota Wang, Laura Lyman Rodriguez, Nadarajen Vydelingum, and Esther Warshauer-Baker.