Skip to main content
Log in

Patients’ trust in physicians: Many theories, few measures, and little data

  • Perspectives
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trust is one of the central features of patient-physician relationships. Rapid changes in the health care system are feared by many to be threatening patients’ trust in their physicians. Yet, despite its acknowledged importance and potential fragility, rigorous efforts to conceptualize and measure patient trust have been relatively few. This article presents a synopsis of theories about patient trust and the evolution of methods to measure it. Clinicians, educators, and researchers interested in this area may find this information useful in practice and teaching. The gaps identified in our knowledge about trust can help target new efforts to strengthen the methodological basis of work to understand this vital element of medical relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mechanic D, Schlesinger M. The impact of managed care on patients’ trust in medical care and their physicians. JAMA. 1996;275:1693–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kao AC, Green DC, Zaslavsky AM, Koplan JP, Cleary PD. The relationship between method of physician payment and patient trust. JAMA. 1998;280:1708–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Emanuel EJ, Dubler NN. Preserving the physician-patient relationship in the era of managed care. JAMA. 1995;273:323–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mechanic D. Changing medical organization and the erosion of trust. Milbank Q. 1996;74:171–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gray BH. Trust and trustworthy care in the managed care era. Health Aff (Millwood). 1997;16:34–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Luhman N. Trust and Power. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barber B. The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gambetta D. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kramer RM, Taylor TR, eds. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis JD, Weigert A. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces. 1985;3:967–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baier A. Trust and antitrust: trust and its varieties. Ethics. 1986;96:231–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gurtman MB. Trust, distrust, and interpersonal problems: a circumplex analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992;62:989–1002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson LA, Dedrick RF. Development of the Trust in Physician Scale: a measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships. Psychol Rep. 1990;67:1091–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thom DH, Campbell B. Patient-physician trust: an exploratory study. J Fam Pract. 1997;44:169–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Caterinicchio RP. Testing plausible path models of interpersonal trust in patient-physician treatment relationships. Soc Sci Med. 1979;13A:81–99.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mechanic D. The functions and limitations of trust in the provision of medical care. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1998;23:661–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Goold SD. Money and trust: relationships between patients, physicians, and health plans. J Health Polit Policy Law 1998;23:687–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Safran DG, Kosinski M, Tarlov AR, et al. The Primary Care Assessment Survey: tests of data quality and measurement performance. Med Care. 1998;36:728–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kao AC, Green DC, Davis NA, Koplan JP, Cleary PD. Patients’ trust in their physicians: effects of choice, continuity, and payment method. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:681–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Grumbach K, Selby JV, Damberg C, et al. Resolving the gatekeeper conundrum: what patients value in primary care and referrals to specialists. JAMA. 1999;282:261–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S, Roberts M, et al. Patients evaluate their hospital care: a national survey. Health Aff (Millwood). 1991;10:254–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thom DH, Bloch DA, Segal ES. An intervention to increase patients’ trust in their physicians. Acad Med. 1999;74:195–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Ware JE, Tarlov AR. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract. 1998;47:213–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ware JE Jr., Hays RD. Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. Med Care. 1988;26:393–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wolf MH, Putnam SM, James SA, Stiles WB. The Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale: development of a scale to measure patient perceptions of physician behavior. J Behav Med. 1978;1:391–401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992;305:160–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for working adults. BMJ. 1993;306:1437–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven D. Pearson MD, MSc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pearson, S.D., Raeke, L.H. Patients’ trust in physicians: Many theories, few measures, and little data. J GEN INTERN MED 15, 509–513 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.11002.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.11002.x

Keywords

Navigation