Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Attitudes and beliefs of african americans toward participation in medical research

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe barriers to participation of African Americans in research.

DESIGN: Focus group interviews conducted in 1997.

PATIENTS: Thirty-three African-American adults presenting to an urban public hospital for outpatient medical care participated in one of five focus groups.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: African-American patients’ attitudes toward medical research were measured. Mistrust of doctors, scientists, and the government was reported consistently by the participants. Many participants described concerns about the ethical conduct of clinicians and investigators when poor or minority patients are involved and cited examples of exploitation as supporting evidence for their mistrust of the medical establishment. While participants were clear about the violation of human rights in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, all were misinformed of the historical facts of the study. Few participants understood the concept of informed consent. Participants saw signing the document as relinquishing their autonomy and as a legal protection for physicians. Despite these concerns, participants gave recommendations to improve minority participation in research.

CONCLUSIONS: African-American participants in this study described distrust of the medical community as a prominent barrier to participation in clinical research. Participants described real and perceived examples of exploitation to support their distrust of researchers. The goal of the consent process, to inform patients of risks and benefits so as to facilitate self-determination, was misinterpreted by these participants. Understanding the importance of interpersonal trust within the clinical relationship may prove to be a significant factor in enhancing participation in clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chavkin W. Women and clinical research. J Am Med Women’s Assoc. 1994;49:99–100.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen M. The dilemma for women of color in clinical trials. JAMA. 1994;49:105–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mohiuddin SM, Hilleman DE. Gender and racial bias in clinical pharmacology trials. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27:972–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Swanson GM, Ward AJ. Recruiting minorities into clinical trials: toward a participant-friendly system. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:1747–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wermeling D, Selwitz A. Current issues surrounding women and minorities in drug trials. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27:904–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cotton P. Is there still too much extrapolation from data on middle aged white men? JAMA. 1990;263:1049–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dresser R. Wanted: single, white male for medical research. Hastings Cent Rep. 1992;22:24–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Robinson SB, Ashley M, Haynes MA. Attitudes of African-Americans regarding prostate cancer clinical trials. J Commun Health. 1996;21:77–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Roberson NL. Clinical trial participation: viewpoints from racial/ethnic groups. Cancer. 1994;74:2687–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris Y, Gorelick PB, Samuels P, Bempong I. Why African Americans may not be participating in clinical trials. J Natl Med Assoc. 1996;88:630–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Million-Underwood S, Sanders E, Davis M. Determinants of participation in state-of-the-art cancer prevention, early detection, screening, and treatment trials among African-Americans. Cancer Nurs. 1993;16:25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krueger RA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1994:255.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kitzinger J. Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995;311:299–302.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rask K, Williams M, Parker R, McNagny S. Obstacles predicting lack of a regular provider and delays in seeking care for patients at an urban public hospital. JAMA. 1994;271:1931–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. In: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, Ill: Aldine Publishing Co.; 1967:101–15.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1994:643.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gamble VN. Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1773–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas SB, Quinn SC. The Tuskegee syphilis study. 1932 to 1972: implications for HIV education and AIDS risk education in the black community. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1498–1505.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brandt AM. Racism and research: the case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Hastings Cent Rep. December 1987.

  20. Caplan AL. When evil intrudes. Hastings Cent Rep. 1992;22:29–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Edgar H. Outside the community. Hastings Cent Rep. 1992;22:32–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. King P. The dangers of difference. Hastings Cent Rep. 1992;22:35–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones J. Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nuremberg Code: Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Contol Council Law; 1949:2:181–2.

  25. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Recommendations Guiding Medical Doctors in Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects (1975 revision of original 1964 version). MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass: 1964:328–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Department of Health and Human Services, 40 FR 33528. August 8, 1975.

  27. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare; 1979. DHEW publications (OS) 78-0013 and (OS) 78-0014.

  28. Pinn VW. The role of the NIH’s Office of Research on Women’s Health. Acad Med. 1994;69:698–702.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. NIH guidelines on the inclusion of women and minorities as subjects in clinical research; notice. Fed Reg. 1994;54:14508–13.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mouton CP, Harris S, Rovi S, Solorzano P, Johnson MS. Barriers to black women’s participation in clinical trials. J Natl Med Assoc. 1997;89:721–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Green BL, Maisiak R, Wang MQ, Britt MF, Ebeling N. Participation in health education, health promotion, and health research by African Americans: effects of the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. J Health Educ. 1997;28:196–201.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Des Jarlais DC, Stepherson B. History, ethics, and politics in AIDS prevention research. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1393–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cox J. Paternalism, informed consent and Tuskegee. Int J Radiat Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1998;40:1–2. Editorial; comments.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wolinsky H. Steps still being taken to undo damage of “American’s Nuremberg.” Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:143–5.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Guinan M. Black communities’ belief in “AIDS as genocide”: a barrier to overcome for HIV prevention. Ann Epidemiol. 1993;3:193–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Thomas SB, Curran JW. Tuskegee: from science to conspiracy to metaphor. Am J Med Sci. 1999;317:1–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Dula A. African American suspicion of the healthcare system is justified: what do we do about it? Camb Q Health Ethics. 1994;3:347–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gamble V. A legacy of distrust: African Americans and medical research. Am J Prev Med. 1993;9:35–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lidz CW, Meisel A, Osterweis M, Holden JL, Marx JH, Munetz MR. Barriers to informed consent. Ann Intern Med. 1993;99:539–43.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lantos J. Informed consent: the whole truth for patients? Cancer. 1993;72:2811–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Taylor KM, Kelner M. Informed consent: the physicians’ perspective. Soc Sci Med. 1987;24:135–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Corbie-Smith G. The continuing legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: considerations for clinical investigation. Am J Med Sci. 1999;317:5–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Williams MV, Parker RM, Baker DW, et al. Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals. JAMA. 1995;274:1677–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Taylor K, Bezjak A, Fraser H. Informed consent for clinical trials: is simpler better? J Nat Cancer Inst. 1998;90:644–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Davis T, Holcombe R, Berkel H, Prammanik S, Divers S. Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:668–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Smith R. Deception in research, and racial discrimination in medicine. BMJ. 1993;396:668–9.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Agre P, McKee K, Gargon N, Kurtz R. Patient satisfaction with an informed consent process. Cancer Pract. 1997;5:162–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Onel E, Hamond C, Wasson J, et al. Assessment of the feasibility and impact of shared decision making in prostate cancer. Urology. 1998;51:63–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Aaronson N, Zittoun R. Informed consent and cancer clinical trials. In: Psychological Aspects of Oncology. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Krynski M, Tymchuk A, Ouslander J. How informed can consent be? New light on comprehension among elderly people making decisions about enteral tube feeding. Gerontologist. 1994;34:36–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Rikkert M, van den Bercken JH, ten Have HA, Hoefnagels WH. Experienced consent in geriatrics research: a new method to optimize the capacity to consent in frail elderly subjects. J Med Ethics. 1997;23:271–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Biros M, Lewis J, Olson CM, Runge J, Cummins R, Fost N. Informed consent in emergency research: consensus statement from the Coalition Conference of Acute Resuscitation and Critical Care Researchers. JAMA. 1995;273:1283–7. Special Communication.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Truog R, Robinson W, Randolph A, Morris A. Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials? N Engl J Med. 1999;340:804–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Brody B, Katz J, Dula A. In case of emergency: no need for consent. Hastings Cent Rep. 1997;27:7; discussion 7–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Mattson ME, Curb D, McArdle R, AMIS and BHAT Research Groups. Participation in a clinical trial: the patient’s point of view. Control Clin Trials. 1985;6:156–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Blumenthal DS, Sung J, Coates R, Williams J, Liff J. Mounting research addressing issues of race/ethnicity in health care: recruitment and retention of subjects for a longitudinal cancer prevention study in an inner-city black community. Health Serv Res. 1995;30:197–205.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Wilcox M, Schroer S. The perspective of patients with vascular disease on participation in clinical trials. J Vasc Nurs. 1994;12:112–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Tangrea JA, Adrianza ME, Helsel WE. Patients’ perceptions on participation in a cancer chemoprevention trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1992;1:325–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Cunny KA, Miller HW. Participation in clinical drug studies: motivations and barriers. Clin Ther. 1994;16:273–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Aby JS, Pheley AM, Steinberg P. Motivation for participation in clinical trials of drugs for the treatment of asthma, seasonal allergic rhinitis, and perennial nonallergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996;76:348–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Daughtery C, Ratain M, Grochoowski E, et al. Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:1062–72.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bigorra J, Banos JE. Weight of financial reward in the decision by medical students and experienced healthy volunteers to participate in clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;38:443–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Barofsky I, Sugarbaker P. Determinants of patient nonparticipation in randomized clinical trials for the treatment of sarcomas. Cancer Clin Trials. 1979;2:237–46.

    Google Scholar 

  64. El-Sadr W, Capps L. The challenge of minority recruitment in clinical trials for AIDS. JAMA. 1992;267:954–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Feldman D, Novack D, Gracely E. Effects of managed care of physician-patient relationships, quality of care, and the ethical practice of medicine: a physician survey. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1626–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Diaz T, Chu SY, Sorvillo F, et al. Differences in participation in experimental drug trials among persons with AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1995;10:562–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Stone VE, Mauch MY, Steger K, Janas SF, Craven DE. Race, gender, drug use, and participation in AIDS clinical trials. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:150–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Quinn SC. AIDS and the African American woman: the triple burden of race, class, and gender. Health Educ Q. 1993;20:305–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Levine DM, Becker DM, Bone LR, Hill MN, Tuggle MB II, Zeger SL. Community-academic health center partnerships for underserved minority populations. JAMA. 1994;272:309–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Foster MW, Bernsten D, Carter TH. A model agreement for genetic research in socially identifiable populations. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:696–702.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Freeman HP. The impact of clinical trial protocols on patient care systems in a large city hospital: access for the socially disadvantaged. Cancer. 1993;72:2834–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Kaluzny A, Brawley O, Garson-Angert D, et al. Assuring access to state-of-the-art care for U.S. minority populations: the first 2 years of the minority-based community clinical oncology program. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:1945–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Gorelick PB, Richardson D, Hudson E, et al. Establishing a community network for recruitment of African Americans into a clinical trial: the African-American Antiplatelet Stroke Prevention Study (AAASPS) experience. J Natl Med Assoc. 1996;88:701–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Barry M. Ethical considerations of human investigation in developing countries: the AIDS Dilemma. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1083–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by an intramural grant from The Emory Medical Care Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corbie-Smith, G., Thomas, S.B., Williams, M.V. et al. Attitudes and beliefs of african americans toward participation in medical research. J GEN INTERN MED 14, 537–546 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.07048.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.07048.x

Key words

Navigation