Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Parental perception of time and decision-making in neonatal research

Abstract

Objective:

To assess the impact of time on parental decision-making for research participation for neonates with congenital heart disease.

Study Design:

Interviews were conducted with 37 parents of 19 neonates with congenital heart disease who were eligible for three different studies: genetic etiology of congenital heart disease, heart rate variability (HRV) and structural and functional cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All parents were asked the same questions: (1) ‘Did you have adequate time to make a decision about research?’ and (2) ‘Why?’ Differences between groups (reporting adequate and inadequate time) were evaluated using Fisher's exact tests; central themes were examined using qualitative analysis.

Result:

Of those parents who reported having adequate time to make their decision (22 of 37), the majority chose to participate when compared to those who reported inadequate time (genetics study, P<0.01; HRV, P=0.05; MRI, P<0.01). For the parents reporting inadequate time, consistent themes emerged: insufficient time to make an educated choice (n=10), consideration of study logistics (n=8), spouse not present at the time of decision (n=7) and insufficient time to discuss the studies (n=4).

Conclusion:

Parental perception of adequate time to decide about research participation was associated with parental willingness to enroll the child in research. Despite any time limitations, parents were satisfied with the decisions they made. Optimizing the time available for the parental permission process could enhance research participation in the neonatal period.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allmark P, Mason SA, Gill AB, Megone C . Obtaining consent for neonatal research. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88: F166–F167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mason SA, Allmark PJ . Obtaining informed consent to neonatal randomised controlled trials: interviews with parents and clinicians in the Euricon study. Lancet 2000; 356 (9247): 2045–2051.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burgess E, Singhal N, Amin H, McMillan DD, Devrome H . Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective survey and a prospective study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88: F280–F286.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kraybill EN . The challenge of informed consent in neonatal research. J Perinatol 2004; 24: 407–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoehn KS, Wernovsky G, Rychik J, Tian ZY, Donaghue D, Alderfer MA et al. Parental decision-making in congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young 2004; 14: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoehn KS, Wernovsky G, Rychik J, Gaynor JW, Spray TL, Feudtner C et al. What factors are important to parents making decisions about neonatal research? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90: 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zakay D . The impact of time perception processes on decision making under time stress, in time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. In: Svenson, Maule AJ (eds). Plenum Press: New York, 1993, pp 59–72.

  8. Licht DJ, Wang J, Silvestre DW, Nicolson SC, Monetenegro LM, Wernovsky G et al. Preoperative cerebral blood flow is diminished in neonates with severe congenital heart defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 128 (6): 841–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Richard L . Using NVivo in Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. QSR International: Melbourne, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Code of Federal Regulations. 45 CFR 46.408. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (Subpart D). In: United States Department of Health and Human Services; 1991.

  11. Zupancic JA, Gillie P, Streiner DL, Watts JL, Schmidt B . Determinants of parental authorization for involvement of newborn infants in clinical trials. Pediatrics 1997; 99 (1): e6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hulst JM, Peters JW, van den Bos A, Joosten KF, van Goudouever JB, Zimmerman LJ et al. Illness severity and parental permission for clinical research in the pediatric ICU population. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 880–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eder ML, Yamokoski AD, Wittmann PW, Kodish ED . Improving informed consent: suggestions from parents of children with leukemia. Pediatrics 2007; 119 (4): e849–e859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller VA, Drotar D, Burant C, Kodish E . Clinician-parent communication during informed consent for pediatric leukemia trials. J Pediatr Psychol 2005; 30 (3): 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hall MA, Camacho F, Lawlor JS, Depuy V, Sugarman J, Weinfurt K . Measuring trust in medical researchers. Med Care 2006; 44 (11): 1048–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Truog RD . Increasing the participation of children in clinical research. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 760–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K S Hoehn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoehn, K., Nathan, A., White, L. et al. Parental perception of time and decision-making in neonatal research. J Perinatol 29, 508–511 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.5

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links