Abstract
The objective of this article is to analyse and compare four methods of ethical case deliberation. These include Clinical Pragmatism, The Nijmegen Method of ethical case deliberation, Hermeneutic dialogue, and Socratic dialogue. The origin of each method will be briefly sketched. Furthermore, the methods as well as the related protocols will be presented. Each method will then be evaluated against the background of those situations in which it is being used. The article aims to show that there is not one ideal method of ethical case deliberation, which fits to all possible kinds of moral problems. Rather, as each of the methods highlights a limited number of morally relevant aspects, each method has its strengths and weaknesses as well. These strengths and weaknesses should be evaluated in relation to different types of situations, for instance moral problems in treatment decisions, moral uneasiness and residue, and the like. The suggestion arrived at on the basis of the findings of this paper is a reasonable methodological plurality. This means that a method can be chosen depending on the type of moral problem to be deliberated upon. At the same time it means, that by means of a method, deliberation should be facilitated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agich G.: 2001, ‘The Question of Method in Ethics Consultation’, The American Journal of Bioethics 1(4), 31–41.
Akkerman, A.E., W.J.M. Evers, H.A.M.J. ten Have, L.A.A. Kollée and B. Gordijn: 2001, ‘Moreel beraad nader onderzocht. Evaluatie van ethisch overleg in de neonatologie’, Tijdschrift voor geneeskunde en ethiek 11, 40–46.
American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH): 1998, Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultation. Glenview, IL: ASBH.
Badura, J.: 2002, Die Suche nach Angemessenheit. Praktische Philosophie als ethische Beratung. Münster: Lit.
Beauchamp, T.L. and J.F. Childress: 2001, Principles of Bioemedical Ethics, 5th edition. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Birnbacher, D.: 1999, ‘The Socratic Method in Teaching Medical Ethics’, Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 2(3), 219–224.
Boitte, P.: 1998, ‘The Role of the Clinical Ethicist in the Hospital’, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1(1), 65–70.
Brody, H. and F.G. Miller: 1998, ‘The Internal Morality of Medicine: Explication and Application to Managed Care’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23, 384–410.
Cadoré, B.: 1997a, L’éthique clinique comme philosophie contextuelle. Montréal (Québec): Fides.
Cadoré, B.: 1997b, Proposition d’une démarche pour l’analyse éthique d’une décision. Université Catholique de Lille, 3 mars 1997.
Caplan, A.: 1982, ‘Mechanics on Duty: The Limitations of a Technical Definition of Moral Expertise for Work in Applied Ethics’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary VIII, 1–17.
Cohn, Ruth C.: 1997, Von der Psychoanalyse zur themenezentrierten Interaktion. Von der Behandlung einzelner zu einer Pädagogik für alle. 13. erw. Auflage. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Dewey, J.: 1991, How We Think. Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books.
Durand, G.: 1997, Introduction Générale à la Bioéthique. Histoire, Concepts et Outils. Montréal (Québec): Fides.
Fins, J.J. and M.D. Bacchetta: 1995, ‘Framing the Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Active Euthanasia Debate: The Role of Deontology, Consequentialism, and Clinical Pragmatism’, JAGS 43, 563–568.
Fins, J.J., M.D. Bacchetta and F.G. Miller: 1997, ‘Clinical Pragmatism: A Method of Moral Problem Solving’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7(2), 129–145.
Fins, J.J., F.G. Miller and M.D. Bacchetta: 1998, ‘Clinical Pragmatism: Bridging Theory and Practice’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8(1), 37–42.
Fletcher, J.C., P.A. Lombardo, M.F. Marshall and F.G. Miller: 1997, Introduction to Clinical Ethics, 2nd edition. Hagerstown, MD: University Publishing Group.
Gadamer, H.G.: 1975, ‘Über die Möglichkeit einer philosophischen Ethik’, in: H.G. Gadamer, Kleine Schriften I, pp. 179–191.
Gerdes, B. and G. Richter: 1999, ‘Ethik-Konsultationsdienst nach dem Konzept von J.C. Fletcher an der University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA. Ein Praxisbericht aus dem Klinikum der Philipps-Universität Marburg’, Ethik in der Medizin 11, 249–261.
Gordijn, B.: 2000, ‘Ethische Diskussion im Team. Nimwegener Modell der multidisziplinären Fallbesprechung’, Die Schwester/Der Pfleger 39, 114–117.
Gracia Guillen, D.: 2001, ‘Moral Deliberation: The Role of Methodologies in Clinical Ethics’, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4, 223–232.
ten Have, H.A.M.J.: 1994, ‘The Hyperreality of Clinical Ethics: A Unitary Theory and Hermeneutics’, Theoretical Medicine 15(2), 113–131.
ten Have H.A.M.J.: 1999, ‘Interpretatie in praktijk. Klinische ethiek en de prudente zorgverlener’, in: J.P. Wils (red.), Ethiek en hermeneutiek. CEKUN Boekenreeks 6. Leende: Uitgeverij Damon, pp. 239–263.
Heckmann, G.: 1993, Das Sokratische Gespräch. Erfahrungen in philosophischen Hochsschulseminaren. Frankfurt a.M.: dipa-Verlag.
Jansen, L.A.: 1998, ‘Assessing Clinical Pragmatism’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8(1), 23–36.
Jonsen, A.R., M. Siegler and W. Winslade: 1998. Clinical Ethics. A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill (First edition 1976).
Jonsen, A.R. and S.E. Toulmin: 1988, The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
Kessels, J.: 1999, Socrates op de markt. Filosofie in bedrijf. Amsterdam: Boom.
Lamau, M.L., B. Cadoré and P. Boitte: 1997, ‘From The Ethical Treatment of Patients in a Persistent Vegetative State to a Philosophical Reflection on Contemporary Medicine’, Theoretical Medicine 18(3), 237–262.
LaPuma, J. and S.E. Toulmin: 1989, ‘Ethics Consultants and Ethics Committees’, Archives of Internal Medicine 149(5), 1109–1112.
Littig, B.: 1999, ‘Die Analyse von (Fall-)Beispielen. Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede zwischen sokratischem Gespräch und interpretativ-hermeneutischen Verfahren der qualitativen Sozialforschung’, in: D. Krohn (red.), Das Sokratische Gespräch — Möglichkeiten in philosophischer und pädagogischer Praxis. Frankfurt a.M.: dipa Verlag, pp. 159–173.
Martin, P.A.: 1999, ‘Bioethics and the Whole: Pluralism, Consensus and the Transmutation of Bioethical Methods into Gold’, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 27(4), 316–327.
Miller, F.G., J.J. Fins and M.D. Bacchetta: 1996, ‘Clinical Pragmatism: John Dewey and Clinical Ethics’, Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 13, 27–51.
Moreno, J.: 1995, Deciding Together. Bioethics and Moral Consensus. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nelson, L.: 1996, Die Sokratische Methode. Vorwort von Gisela Raupach-Strey. Kassel: Weber, Zucht.
Ricoeur, P.: 1992, Oneself as Another. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
Ross, W.D.: 1930, The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Steinkamp, N. and B. Gordijn: 2001, ‘The Two-Layer Model of Clinical Ethics and a Training Program for the Malteser Hospital Association’, HEC Forum 13(3), 242–254.
Steinkamp, N.L. and B. Gordijn: 2003, Ethik in der Klinik — ein Arbeitsbuch. Zwischen Leitbild und Stationsalltag. Neuwied, Köln, Wien: Luchterhand.
Thomas Aquinas: 1988, On Law, Morality, and Politics. Edited, with Introduction, by W.P. Baumgarth and R.J. Regan and S.J. Indianapolis. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
Tong, R.: 1997, ‘The Promises and Perils of Pragmatism: Commentary on Fins, Bacchetta, and Miller’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7(2), 147–152.
van Tongeren, P.: 1997, ‘Ervaring en uitleg. Over ethiek als hermeneutiek van de morele ervaring, tegen de achtergrond van het onderscheid tussen een theologische en een wijsgerige ethiek’, in: J. Gruppelaar (red.), Ervaring funderen en ondermijnen. CEKUN werkdocument 2. Nijmegen.
West, M.B.: 1992 ‘Mediation and Communication Techniques in Ethics Consultation’, The Journal of Clinical Ethics 3(4), 291–292.
West, M.B. and J.M. Gibson: 1992 ‘Facilitating Medical Ethics Case Review: What Ethics Committees Can Learn From Mediation and Facilitation Techniques’, Cambridge Quarterly of Health Care Ethics 1(1), 63–74.
Widdershoven, G.: 2000, Ethiek in de kliniek: hedendaagse benaderingen in de gezondheidsethiek. Amsterdam: Boom.
Wilson Ross, J.: 1990, ‘Case Consultation: “The Committee or the Clinical Consultant?”’, HEC Forum 2(5), 255–264.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steinkamp, N., Gordijn, B. Ethical case deliberation on the ward. A comparison of four methods. Med Health Care Philos 6, 235–246 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025928617468
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025928617468