Abstract
Are there distinctly European values in bioethics, and if there are, what are they? Some Continental philosophers have argued that the principles of dignity, precaution, and solidarity reflect the European ethos better than the liberal concepts of autonomy, harm, and justice. These principles, so the argument goes, elevate prudence over hedonism, communality over individualism, and moral sense over pragmatism. Contrary to what their proponents often believe, however, dignity, precaution, and solidarity can be interpreted in many ways, and it is not clear which reading would, or should, be favored by popular opinion. It is therefore dangerous to think that any one understanding of ``European'', or any other, values could be legitimately imposed on those who have different ideas about morality in health care and related fields. Bioethical principles should be employed to promote discussion, not to suppress it.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aquinas, T. On Law, Morality and Politics. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1988.
Aristotle. Nichomachean Ethics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1982.
Baier, A. Moral Prejudices. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1994.
Bayertz, K., ed. “Solidarity and the Welfare State.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (1998): 293–392.
Beauchamp, T.L., Childress, J.F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics (1979), Fifth edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Beauchamp, T.L. “Principlism and its Alleged Competitors.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (1995): 181–198.
Beauchamp, T.L. “The Mettle of Moral Fundamentalism: A Reply to Robert Baker.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (1998): 389–401.
Bentham, J. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789). London and New York: Methuen, 1970.
Black, M., Mooney, G. “Equity in Health Care from a Communitarian Standpoint.” Health Care Analysis 10 (2002): 193–208.
Chadwick, R. “Playing God.” Cogito 3 (1989): 186–193.
Clouser, K.D. “Common Morality as an Alternative to Principlism.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (1995): 219–236.
Clouser, K.D., Gert, B. “A Critique of Principlism.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (1990): 219–236.
Dennis, C., Gallagher, R., Campbell, P. “Everyone's Genome.” Nature 409 (2001): 813.
Devlin, P. “The Enforcement of Morals (1959).” Reprinted (as “Morals and the Criminal Law”). In: Devlin, P., ed. The Enforcement of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965, pp. 1–25.
Frankena, W.K. Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
Gillon, R., ed. Principles of Health Care Ethics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
Gillon, R. “Defending ‘The Four Principles’ Approach to Biomedical Ethics.” Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (1995): 323–324.
Gillon, R. Philosophical Medical Ethics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1985.
Green, R.M., Gert, B., Clouser, K.D. “The Method of Public Morality Versus the Method of Principlism.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1993): 179–197.
Hansson, S.O. “The Limits of Precaution.” Foundations of Science 2 (1997): 293–306.
Harris, J. “Cloning and Bioethical Thinking.” Nature 389 (1997): 433.
Harris, J. “Is Cloning an Attack on Human Dignity?” Nature 387 (1997): 754.
Häyry, M. “Categorical Objections to Genetic Engineering – A Critique.” In: Dyson, A., Harris, J., eds. Ethics and Biotechnology. London and New York: Routledge, 1994, pp. 202–215.
Häyry, M. Liberal Utilitarianism and Applied Ethics. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.
Häyry, M. “But What if we Feel that Cloning is Wrong?” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (2001): 205–208.
Häyry, M. “Another Look at Dignity.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, forthcoming.
Häyry, M. “Precaution and Solidarity.” In: Thomasma, D., Novak, D., Weisstub, D., eds. The Foundations of Health Care. Dordrect: Kluwer Academic Publishers, forthcoming.
Häyry, M., Takala, T. “Genetic Engineering and the Risk of Harm.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1 (1998): 61–64.
Hermitte, M.-A. “Le Principe de Précaution à la lumière du drame de la transfusion sanguine en France.” In: Godard, O., ed. Le Principe de Prècaution dans la Conduite des Affaires Humaines. Coèditions INRA, MSH et Association Natures, Sciences, Société-Dialogues, 1997, pp. 179–189.
Holm, S. “Not Just Autonomy – The Principles of American Biomedical Ethics.” Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (1995): 332–338.
Houtepen, R., ter Meulen, R., eds. “Solidarity in Health Care.” Health Care Analysis 8 (2000): 329–411.
Houtepen, R., ter Meulen, R. “New Types of Solidarity in the European Welfare State.” Health Care Analysis 8 (2000): 329–340.
Husserl, E. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Translated by Cairns D. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960.
Jonas, H. Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versus einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation, Seventh edition. Frankfurt am Main: Insel, 1987.
Jonsen, A. “Casuistry: An Alternative or Complement to Principles?” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (1995): 237–251.
Kahn, A. “Cloning, Dignity and Ethical Revisionism.” Nature 388 (1997): 320.
Kaiser, M. “ ‘The Precautionary Principle and its Implications for Science’ – Introduction.” Foundations of Science 2 (1997): 201–205.
Kant, I. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (1785). Translated by Ellington, J.W. and reprinted in: Kant, I. Ethical Philosophy, Second edition. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1994.
Kant, I. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (1797). Translated by Ladd, J. and reprinted in: Kant, I. Metaphysical Elements of Justice, Second edition. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1999.
Kant, I. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre (1797). Translated by Ellington, J.W. and reprinted in: Kant, I. Ethical Philosophy, Second edition. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1994.
Labib, K. “Don't Leave Dignity Out of the Cloning Debate.” Nature 388 (1997): 15.
MacIntyre, A. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (1981), Second edition. London: Duckworth, 1985.
Martin, P.H. “ ‘If You Don't Know How to Fix It, Then Please Stop Braking It!’ The Precautionary Principle and Climate Change.” Foundations of Science 2 (1997): 263–292.
McFaden, A. The Call to Personhood: A Christian Theory of the Individual in Social Relationships Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Mill, J.S. On Liberty (1859). Reprinted in: Mill, J.S. On Liberty and The Subjection of Women. Ware, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth, 1996, pp. 1–114.
Mill, J.S. Utilitarianism (1861). Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1979.
Pascal, B. Pensées. Paris: Le livre de poche, 1972.
Pellegrino, E.D. “Toward a Virtue-Based Normative Ethics for the Health Professions.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (1995): 253–277.
Pellegrino, E.D., Thomasma, D.C. For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
Pellegrino, E.D., Thomasma, D.C. The Virtues of Medical Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.
Rendtorff, J.D., Kemp, P., eds. Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw 1 & 2. Copenhagen and Barcelona: Centre for Ethics and Law & Institut Borja de Bioètica, 2000.
Shapiro, D. “Cloning, Dignity and Ethical Reasoning.” Nature 388 (1997): 511.
Takala, T. “Justice For all? The Scandinavian Approach.” In: Rhodes, R., Battin, M.P., Silvers, A., eds. Medical and Social Justice: Essays on the Distribution of Health Care. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 183–190.
Takala, T. “The (Im)morality of (Un)naturalness.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, forthcoming.
Takala, T. “What is Wrong with Global Bioethics? On the Limitations of the Four Principles Approach.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (2001): 72–77.
Tonti-Filippini, N. “The Concept of Human Dignity in the International Human Rights Instruments.” In: de Dios Valdo Correa, J., Sgreccia, E., eds. Identity and Statute of Human Embryo. Città del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1998, pp. 381–404.
Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, adopted by the General Conference of UNESCP at its 29th session on 11 November 1997.
Veatch, R.M. “Resolving Conflicts Among Principles: Ranking, Balancing, and Specifying.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (1995): 199–218.
von Nell-Breuning, O. Baugesetze der Gesellschaft. Freiburg: Herder, 1990.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Häyry, M. European values in bioethics: Why, what, and how to be used. Theor Med Bioeth 24, 199–214 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024814710487
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024814710487