Skip to main content
Log in

Brief Report: Autonomy Versus Coercion: Reconciling Competing Perspectives in Community Mental Health

  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinicians working in community mental health must currently attempt to reconcile competing practice perspectives: on the one hand consumer-driven approaches, and on the other hand a move to more paternalistic practices, advocated by family support groups, and reflected in assertive treatment programs and legislative initiatives such as community treatment orders. This article reviews these different perspectives, and offers some comments on practice guidelines for those working in this clinically and politically complex environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anthony, W. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16(4), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J. & Bonnie, R. (1996). When push comes to shove: aggressive community treatment and the law. In: Dennis, D. & Monahan, J. (eds.) Coercion and Aggressive Community Treatment (pp. 172–193). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, G., McGrew, J. & Fekete, D. (1995). Assertive outreach for frequent users of psychiatric hospitals: a meta-analysis. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 22, 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., Blake, M., Donnelly, M. & Herbert, D. (in press). On geriatric liberty. Canadian Journal on Aging.

  • Curtis L. & Hodge, M. (1995). Ethics and boundaries in community support services: new challenges. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 66, 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. (1995). Treating the mentally ill in B.C.: Recent developments in policy and legislation. British Columbia Medical Journal, 37(6), 400–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Buono, V. (1986). Toward a new Criminal Code for Canada. Criminal Law Quarterly, 28, 370–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, D. & Monahan, J. (eds.) (1996). Coercion and Aggressive Community Treatment. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, R. (1996). Coercion and tenacious treatment in the community: Applications to the real world. In: Dennis, D. & Monahan, J. (eds.) Coercion and Aggressive Community Treatment (pp. 51–72). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, J., Goering, P., Wasylenki, D. & Roth, J. (1997). Who gets how much of what: a description of intensive case management. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 20(3), 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, J. (1986). The quandaries of enforced community treatment and unenforceable outpatient commitment statutes. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 14, 1259–1264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, G. & Prince, P. (1999). Measuring client satisfaction with assertive community treatment. Psychiatric Services, 50(4), 546–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J., Shone, M. & Liddle, P. (2000). Canadian Mental Health Law and Policy. Toronto: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, N. (2000). Pump up the Volume: A Report from the Mental Health Advocate of B.C. Vancouver: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, A. (1994). Reflections and Controversy: Essays on Social Work. Washington, D.C.: NASW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiday, V. (1996). Outpatient commitment: official coercion in the community. In: Dennis, D. & Monahan, J. (eds.) Coercion and Aggressive Community Treatment (pp. 29–47). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonson, A., Siegler, M. & Winslade, W. (1998). Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical decisions in Clinical Medicine. (en) New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, J. & Bond, G. (1995). Critical ingredients of assertive community treatment—judgement of the experts. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 22, 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health, British Columbia. (1999). Guide to the Mental Health Act. Victoria, B.C.: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, J., Hoge, S., Lidz, C., Eisenberg, M., Bennett, N., Gardner, W., Mulvey, E. & Roth. L. (1996). Coercion to inpatient treatment: initial results and implications for assertive community treatment in the community. In: Dennis, D. & Monahan, J. (eds.) Coercion and Aggressive Community Treatment (pp. 13–28). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olaffson, B., Jacobsson, L. Fredericka, G. & Norberg, A. (1999). Being in conflict: physicians' experiences with using coercion in psychiatric care. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 55(3), 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheid-Cook, T. (1991). Outpatient commitment as both social control and least restrictive alternative. Sociological Quarterly, 32, 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheid-Cook, T. (1993). Controllers and controlled: an analysis of participant constructions of outpatient commitment. Sociology of Health and Illness, 15, 179–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spindel, P. & Nugent, J. (1999). The trouble with PACT: Questioning the increasing use of assertive community treatment teams in community mental health. Retrieved Jan. 31, 2001, from the World Wide Web: www.scruz.net/_sylvia/readingroom/spindel.nugent.htm.

  • Steadman, H., Mulvey, E., Monahan, J., Robbins, P., Appelbaum, P., Grisso, T., Roth, L. & Silver, E. (1998). Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55(5), 393–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, L. & Test, M. (1980). Alternatives to mental hospital treatment. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37(4), 392–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, M. & Monahan, J. (2001). Introduction to special section on involuntary outpatient commitment. Psychiatric Services, 52 (3), 323–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witheridge, T. (1991). The “active ingredients” of assertive outreach. New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 52.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, S. Brief Report: Autonomy Versus Coercion: Reconciling Competing Perspectives in Community Mental Health. Community Ment Health J 38, 239–250 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015267707856

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015267707856

Navigation