Skip to main content
Log in

Internal vs. External Whistleblowers: A Comparison of Whistleblowering Processes

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We conduct quantitative and qualitative analysis of 33 cases of internal and external whistleblowers wrongfully fired for reporting wrongdoing. Our results show external whistleblowers have less tenure with the organization, greater evidence of wrongdoing, and they tend to be more effective in changing organizational practices. External whistleblowers also experience more extensive retaliation than internal whistleblowers, and patterns of retaliation by management against the whistleblower vary depending on whether the whistleblower reports internally or externally. We discuss implications for organizations and whistleblowers, and we conclude that researchers need to develop different theoretical explanations of internal and external whistleblowing processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Callahan, E. S. and T. M. Dworkin: 1994, ‘Who Blows the Whistle to the Media, and Why: Organizational Characteristics of Media Whistleblowers’, American Business Law Journal 32, 151–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, E. S. and T. M. Dworkin: 1992, ‘Do Good and Get Rich: Financial Incentives for Whistleblowing and the False Claims Act’, Villanova Law Review 37, 301–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D.: 1989, ‘Organizational Harm, Legal Condemnation and Stakeholder Retaliation: A Typology, Research Agenda and Application’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanzo, P. R. and M. E. Shaw: 1966, ‘Conformity as a Function of Age Level’, Child Development 37, 967–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, T. M.: 1992, ‘Legal Approaches to Whistle-Blowing’, in M. P. Miceli and J. P. Near (eds.), Blowing the Whistle (Lexington Books, New York), pp. 232–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, T. M. and E. S. Callahan: 1993, ‘Employee Disclosures to the Media: When is a “Source” a “Sourcerer”?’, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal 15, 357–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, T. M. and E. S. Callahan: 1991, ‘Internal Whistleblowing: Protecting the Interests of the Employee, the Organization, and Society’, American Business Law Journal 29, 269–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, T. M. and J. P. Near: 1990, ‘Whistleblower Statutes and Reality: Is There a Need for Realignment?’, Proceedings of the Pacific Southwest Business Law Association, 71–85.

  • Dworkin, T. M. and J. P. Near: 1987, ‘Whistleblowing Statutes: Are They Working?’, American Business Law Journal 25(2), 241–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M.: 1989, ‘Building Theories from Case Study Research’, Academy of Management Review 14, 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliston, F., J. Keenan, P. Lockhart and J. van Schaick: 1985, Whistleblowing (Praeger Publishers, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, D.: 1983, ‘Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect as Responses to Job Dissatisfaction: A Multidimensional Scaling Study’, Academy of Management Journal 26, 596–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O.: 1970, Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. P.: 1958, ‘Conformity, Status, and Idiosyncrasy Credit’, Psychological Review 65, 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. P.: 1995, ‘Blowing the Whistle on Minor, Less Serious Forms of Fraud: A Study of Managerial-Level Differences’, paper presented at the International Association of Business and Society, Vienna, Austria.

  • Kohn, S. M. and M. D. Kohn: 1988, The Labor Lawyer's Guide to the Rights and Responsibilities of Employee Whistleblowers (Quorum Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolarska, L. and H. Aldrich: 1980, ‘Exit, Voice, and Silence: Consumers' and Managers' Responses to Organizational Decline’, Organizational Studies 1, 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1992, Blowing the Whistle (Lexington Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1988, ‘Retaliation against Role-prescribed Whistle-blowers: The Case of Internal Auditors’, paper presented at the national Academy of Management meeting, Anaheim, CA.

  • Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1985, ‘Characteristics of Organizational Climate and Perceived Wrongdoing Associated with Whistle-blowing Decisions’, Personnel Psychology 38, 525–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1984, ‘The Relationships among Beliefs, Organizational Position, and Whistle-blowing Status: A Discriminant Analysis’, Academy of Management Journal 27, 687–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P., J. P. Near and C. R. Schwenk: 1991, ‘Who Blows the Whistle and Why?’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review 45, 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P., M. S. Baucus and M. P. Miceli: 1993, ‘The Relationship between Values and Practice: Organizational Climates for Wrongdoing’, Administration & Society 25, 204–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P., T. M. Dworkin and M. P. Miceli: 1993,‘Explaining the Whistle-blowing Process: Suggestions from Power Theory and Justice Theory’, Organization Science 4, 393–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P. and M. P. Miceli: 1991, ‘How to Succeed as a Whistle-blower: Predictors of Effective Whistle-blowing’, unpublished working paper (Indiana University, Bloomington).

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P. and M. P. Miceli: 1987, ‘Whistleblowers in Organizations: Dissidents or Reformers?’ in B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior 9, 321–368 (JAI Press, Greenich, CT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P., K. C. Ryan and M. P. Miceli: 1995, ‘Results of a Human Resource Management “Experiment”: Whistle-blowing in the Federal Bureaucracy, 1980–1992’, Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings 1995 (Omnipress, Madison, WI).

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Day, R.: 1972, ‘Intimidation Rituals: Reactions to Reform’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 10, 373–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmerlee, M. A., J. P. Near and T. C. Jensen: 1982, ‘Correlates of Whistleblowers' Perceptions of Organizational Retaliation’, Administrative Science Quarterly 27, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. L.: 1990, ‘The Organizational Consequences of Whistleblowing’, unpublished manuscript available from the School of Public & Environmental Affairs, Indiana University.

  • Weinstein, D.: 1979, Bureaucratic Opposition (Pergamon Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westman, D P.: 1991, Whistleblowing: The Law of Retaliatory Discharge (BNA Books, Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K.: 1989, Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dworkin, T.M., Baucus, M.S. Internal vs. External Whistleblowers: A Comparison of Whistleblowering Processes. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1281–1298 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005916210589

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005916210589

Keywords

Navigation