Organ donationFamily Override of Valid Donor Consent to Postmortem Donation: Issues in Law and Practice
Section snippets
Valid Consent Requirements
In the context of a paper on family override of valid donor consent, it is essential to first clarify the legal requirements for valid donor consent to postmortem donation. It is also important to look at this issue because many health care providers, donors, and substitute decision makers do not understand the legal requirements for a valid consent. Both substantive and procedural requirements must be considered.
Common Law
There are no Canadian court decisions that directly address the issue of family overrides of valid donor consent in the context of postmortem donation. However, the common law16 does set out rules, rights, and duties with respect to dead bodies. Although it is a common law rule that a human corpse is not property, the common law also recognizes a right to possession of the corpse for the purposes of burial, in relation to an executor's legal duty to bury the deceased.17 If there is no executor,
What Is Happening?
A 2006 Canadian survey examined the attitudes of health care professionals in regard to valid donor consent to postmortem donation and family overrides.57 Sixty-nine percent of the health care providers believed that the wishes of the family or next-of-kin would be respected over the wishes of the donor (as recorded on a signed donor card or in a donor registry). A similar survey of public awareness and opinions indicated that 64% of Canadians believed that the wishes of the deceased (as
Recommendations For Reform
With the exception of Manitoba and possibly Quebec, organ and tissue donation legislation does not permit valid donor consent to be overridden by families. This statutory position enjoys strong public support, as evidenced by further results from the 2006 survey mentioned above. This statutory position is also ethically sound, as it is supported by the principle of autonomy, the recognition that the donor has interests which survive past death and should be respected, and the substantial
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank members of the Dalhousie Health Law Institute, Brad Abernethy, and members of the Donation Committee of the Canadian Council for Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the CCDT and/or the federal, provincial, or territorial governments of Canada.
Notes (79)
2006 CORR Preliminary Report: Preliminary Statistics on Organ Donation, Transplantation and Waiting ListPresented at the CST Annual Meeting, March 2006
- Nunavut Human Tissue Act, R.S.N.W.T. 1988, c. H-6, as duplicated for Nunavut by s. 29 of the Nunavut Act, S.C. 1993, c....
- Alberta Human Tissue Gift Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. H-15; Saskatchewan The Human Tissue Gift Act, R.S.S. 1978, c. H-15;...
- The Human Tissue Gift Act, S.M. 1987–88, c. 39, s. 2(2). “Unavailable” is defined in the Act as “unable to act because...
- Informed consent is a legal doctrine that imposes a duty on health care professionals, under the law of negligence, to...
- In the Northwest Territories, Nunavut, and Manitoba, the term “direction” is used instead of “consent.” Human Tissue...
Legal issues arising from donation after cardiocirculatory determination of death
(2005)- Human Tissue Donation Act, S.P.E.I. 1992, c. 34, s....
- Supra note 4, s. 2...
- New Brunswick, Nunavut, Northwest Territories, Manitoba, and Quebec do not legally require the writing to be signed....
Saskatchewan Health: Becoming an Organ or Tissue Donor
Québec-Transplant: How to Indicate Your Wish to Donate Your Organs When You Die
[1930] 4 D.L.R. 255 (Ont. S.C.) [Hunter]. Edmonds v. Armstrong Funeral Home Ltd. (1930), 1 D.L.R. 676 (Alta. S.C.(A.D.)) [Edmonds]. See generally, Law Reform Commission of Canada: Procurement and Transfer of Human Tissues and Organs. Working Paper No. 66
Death, dead bodies and the law
Canadian Hospital
Statutory Interpretation
Canadian Medical Law: An Introduction for Physicians, Nurses and Other Health Care Professionals
Legal Liability of Doctors and Hospitals in Canada, 3rd Ed. Scarborough, On: Carswell; 1996, at 99; O'Brien, supra note 7 at 24; Somerville MA: “Procurement” vs “donation”—access to tissues and organs for transplantation: should “contracting out” legislation be adopted?
Transplant Proc
Canadian Law Dictionary
See also Gouvernement du Quebec, Commission de l'Ethique de la Science et de la Technologie: Organ Donation and Transplantation: Ethical Dilemmas Due to Shortage. Position Statement. 2004
Cited by (13)
When the living and the deceased cannot agree on organ donation: A survey of us organ procurement organizations (OPOs)
2014, American Journal of TransplantationDonation decisions after death: The case for a family veto
2017, Ethics, Medicine and Public HealthCitation Excerpt :This is often considered analogous with regulations regarding property rights and wills of the deceased. Just as we respect a will, which determines the distribution of resources amongst the living, we should respect a decision to donate as a distribution of anatomical resources [8]. Of course, there are few cases where one's death is amenable to transplantation, so this decision to donate should be thought of as a decision to donate insofar as medical circumstances allow it.
Organ Procurement, Donation, and Transplant Awareness in an Urban Eastern European Region: A General Population Survey
2022, Annals of TransplantationFamily veto in organ donation: the experiences of Organ and Tissue Donation Coordinators in Ontario
2021, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia
An earlier unpublished version of this paper was made possible through a financial contribution from Health Canada. Jocelyn Downie has held contracts with the Canadian Council for Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation.