EditorialMinimal Risk, Yet Again
References (17)
- et al.
In defense of a single standard of research risk for all children
J Pediatr
(2005) - et al.
What is a ‘minor’ increase over minimal risk?
J Pediatr
(2005) - et al.
Minimal risk in pediatric research
J Pediatr
(2006) - et al.
A Standard for assessing the risks of pediatric research: pro and con
J Pediatr
(2007) Do healthy children deserve greater protection in medical research?
J Pediatr
(2003)45 CFR Part 46: Additional Protections for Children Involved as Subjects in Research
Federal Register
(1983)21 CFR Parts 50 and 56: Additional Safeguards for Children in Clinical Investigations of FDA-Regulated Products
Federal Register
(2001)Minimal risk as an international ethical standard in research
J Med Philosophy
(2004)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (14)
A defense of the-risks-of-daily-life
2017, Kennedy Institute of Ethics JournalParental and staff perspectives of NICU research procedures
2016, BMC PediatricsTowards an Alternative Account for Defining Acceptable Risk in Non-beneficial Paediatric Research
2016, Research Ethics ForumAssent in Paediatric Research and Its Consequences
2016, Research Ethics ForumBioethical and regulatory issues in newborn medical research
2015, NeoReviewsEthical considerations in conducting pediatric and neonatal research in clinical pharmacology
2015, Current Pharmaceutical Design
Copyright © 2007 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.