Special Section: Controversies in Psychiatry: Pro and Con Editorials

Psychiatric review should be mandatory for patients requesting assisted suicide

Medical assistance in dying (MAID) was legalized in Canada in 2016. We aimed to characterize the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity among MAID requesters in order to enhance clinicians' awareness of the potential for psychiatric needs among MAID requesters.

Using chart review, we retrospectively abstracted demographic, clinical, and psychosocial variables of MAID requesters at our institution, a 638-bed tertiary care center in Toronto, Canada. Patients requesting MAID between June 2016 and April 2019 were included. Psychiatric comorbidity was the primary dependent variable.

155 patients requested MAID during the study period. Among them, 60 (39%) had documented psychiatric comorbidity, most commonly depression (n=44; 73%). Severe mental illness accounted for 10 cases (6.5% of the total sample). Among patients with psychiatric comorbidity, 25 (41.7%) had at least one MAID eligibility assessment conducted by a psychiatrist, compared to 16 (16.8%) patients without psychiatric comorbidity (χ²=11.649, df=1, p=0.001). Among the 10 patients with severe mental illness (SMI), a psychiatrist conducted a MAID eligibility assessment in 8 patients (80%), compared to 17 patients (34%) without SMI (χ²=7.255, df=1, p=0.007).

Patients with psychiatric comorbidity comprise a substantial proportion of patients requesting MAID. These findings highlight the importance of recognizing the psychiatric needs of MAID requesters and involving psychiatry in MAID assessments when warranted. A gap still exists in understanding which factors are most important in determining the need for psychiatric involvement in MAID assessments. We propose recommendations borne from our clinical experience.

Consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatrists are involved in physician-assisted death (PAD) teams in many permitting jurisdictions. This paper will describe our Canadian PAD experience over 2 years, highlighting the role of C-L psychiatrists, at a large hospital network that provides medical assistance in dying (MAID, as this is called in Canada).

We will describe the Canadian criteria for MAID, our multispecialty MAID team experience and the roles, issues and concerns experienced by C-L psychiatrists. Some brief patient examples will be provided.

Our MAID team has managed 186 MAID inquiries, assessed 95 MAID requests and provided 49 MAID interventions over a 24 month period. The 2 co-leaders of the MAID team, 8 assessors and 1 intervention physician are C-L psychiatrists. Each of the MAID criteria: grievous medical condition, advanced state of irreversible decline, intolerable suffering, natural death reasonably foreseeable, voluntary request, capacity and informed consent pose specific challenges to be resolved in the assessment. Several unique MAID issues, including the role of education and mandatory psychiatric assessment and protocols will also be discussed.

Our experience shows that C-L psychiatrists are well-situated to provide vital expertise and leadership to multispecialty PAD teams.

Medical assistance in dying (MAiD) was legalized across Canada in June 2016. Some have expressed concern that patient requests for MAiD might be driven by poor access to palliative care and that social and economic vulnerability of patients may influence access to or receipt of MAiD. To examine these concerns, we describe Ontario’s early experience with MAiD and compare MAiD decedents with the general population of decedents in Ontario.

We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing all MAiD-related deaths with all deaths in Ontario, Canada, between June 7, 2016, and Oct. 31, 2018. Clinical and demographic characteristics were collected for all MAiD decedents and compared with those of all Ontario decedents when possible. We used logistic regression analyses to describe the association of demographic and clinical factors with receipt of MAiD.

A total of 2241 patients (50.2% women) were included in the MAiD cohort, and 186 814 in the general Ontario decedent cohort. Recipients of MAiD reported both physical (99.5%) and psychologic suffering (96.4%) before the procedure. In 74.4% of cases, palliative care providers were involved in the patient’s care at the time of the MAiD request. The statutory 10-day reflection period was shortened for 26.6% of people. Compared with all Ontario decedents, MAiD recipients were younger (mean 74.4 v. 77.0 yr, standardized difference 0.18);, more likely to be from a higher income quintile (24.9% v. 15.6%, standardized difference across quintiles 0.31); less likely to reside in an institution (6.3% v. 28.0%, standardized difference 0.6); more likely to be married (48.5% v. 40.6%) and less likely to be widowed (25.7% v. 35.8%, standardized difference 0.34); and more likely to have a cancer diagnosis (64.4% v. 27.6%, standardized difference 0.88 for diagnoses comparisons).

Recipients of MAiD were younger, had higher income, were substantially less likely to reside in an institution and were more likely to be married than decedents from the general population, suggesting that MAiD is unlikely to be driven by social or economic vulnerability. Given the high prevalence of physical and psychologic suffering, despite involvement of palliative care providers in caring for patients who request MAiD, future studies should aim to improve our understanding and treatment of the specific types of suffering that lead to a MAiD request.