Preimplantation genetic diagnosis as medical innovation: reflections from The President’s Council on Bioethics

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.013

Fertility and Sterility

Volume 85, Issue 6, June 2006, Pages 1633-1637

Presented at “Unnatural Selection: Should California Regulate Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis?” Stanford Law School, Stanford, California, Februaruy 28, 2004.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.013 Get rights and content

Under an Elsevier user license

open archive

In its 2004 report, “Reproduction and Responsibility: The Regulation of New Biotechnologies”, The President’s Council on Bioethics analyzed ethical issues raised by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and made recommendations for improvements.

Key Words

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis

ethical issues

President’s Council on Bioethics

Cited by (0)

: Rebecca Dresser, J.D., is a member of The President’s Council on Bioethics, and was a member of the ASRM Ethics Committee from 1997–2002.

Fertility and Sterility

Stanford symposium on preimplantation genetic diagnosisPreimplantation genetic diagnosis as medical innovation: reflections from The President’s Council on Bioethics

Key Words

Stanford symposium on preimplantation genetic diagnosis
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis as medical innovation: reflections from The President’s Council on Bioethics