Ethics/conceptsTreatment of Potential Organ Donors in the Emergency Department: A Review
Introduction
The gap between the number of individuals awaiting organ transplantation and the number of organs donated has been increasing steadily during the past decade. There are currently more than 100,000 individuals awaiting organs for transplantation, whereas fewer than 30,000 organs are transplanted each year.1, 2 As a result of this disparity, the medical and organ procurement communities have endeavored to increase the number of organs available for transplantation.
Emergency medicine has recently been recognized to play an important role in the organ donation process.3 Although referral for organ donation was traditionally viewed as the domain of inpatient critical care providers, recent evidence highlights the importance of emergency providers in the organ donation process. Specifically, potential donors referred to organ procurement organizations from the emergency department (ED) are far more likely to undergo successful donation than those referred from inpatient settings. In one recent study of referrals to a large organ procurement organization, although far more referrals were initiated from inpatient settings (89%) compared with the ED (11%), referrals from the ED were nearly 3 times more likely to go on to successful donation compared with those from inpatient settings.3 The increased likelihood of successful donation from the ED persisted even after controlling for potential confounding variables such as mechanism of injury, age, and race. The higher rates of successful donation from the ED may be due to earlier recognition and referral of potential donors, allowing additional time for organ procurement organization involvement, providing more time for family decisionmaking, and identifying potential donors with fewer premorbid conditions, including pneumonia, sepsis, and multiorgan failure.3, 4
Meanwhile, clinical advances in transplantation and resuscitation medicine, coupled with efforts to expand the organ donor pool, have raised the possibility of procuring organs from individuals experiencing circulatory, rather than neurologic, death. The majority of these donations occur in controlled, inpatient settings after the discontinuation of life-sustaining therapies such as mechanical ventilation. However, uncontrolled donation after circulatory death is also possible, such as when a patient experiences an unexpected cardiac arrest, is pronounced dead—potentially even in the ED or out-of-hospital setting—and then has care rapidly transitioned to organ preservation and retrieval efforts. Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death has taken place throughout the United States, as well as in Barcelona, Paris, Tokyo, and elsewhere.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 There is growing interest in the ED as a potential source of organ donors, and studies of uncontrolled donation after circulatory death in the out-of-hospital and ED settings are under way.12, 13, 14
This expanding role of emergency medicine in the care of potential organ donors presents unique ethical challenges. Little attention has been paid in the medical literature to these challenges, and what little attention has been paid lacks practical guidance relevant to emergency physicians.15 This article will introduce emergency providers to the ethical challenges of organ donation, including issues of the determination of death, patient autonomy and consent, public perception and trust, goals of care, and conflict between public health and individual patient care.
Section snippets
Determination of Death
The majority of donated organs are retrieved from live donors or through donation after neurologic determination of death. Determination of neurologic death (also referred to as “brain death”) typically requires time and the involvement of neurology or neurosurgery specialists and, as a result, rarely occurs in the ED setting. Nevertheless, the act of referring a patient for potential organ donation can begin before a formal determination of brain death is made. Indeed, the majority of organ
Conclusion
With growing attention being paid to the ED as a valuable source of potential organ donors, emergency providers need to be cognizant of the ethical challenges and aware of the potential benefit of overseeing the referral of potential organ donors from the ED. Emergency providers should review their organ procurement organization's referral guidelines and, given the increased likelihood of successful donation when patients are referred from the ED, should have a low threshold for referring
References (44)
- et al.
Kidney transplant function using organs from non-heart-beating donors maintained by mechanical chest compressions
Resuscitation
(2010) - et al.
Scientific, legal, and ethical challenges of end-of-life organ procurement in emergency medicine
Resuscitation
(2010) - et al.
Organ donation: key factors influencing families' decision-making
Transplant Proc
(2005) The ethics of heparin administration to the potential non-heart-beating organ donor
J Prof Nurs
(2005)- et al.
Attitudes of the American public toward organ donation after uncontrolled (sudden) cardiac death
Am J Transplant
(2010) - et al.
Is rapid organ recovery a good idea? an exploratory study of the public's knowledge and attitudes
Am J Transplant
(2009) - et al.
Derivation of the uncontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death protocol for New York City
Am J Transplant
(2011) 2007 Annual Report of the US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: Transplant Data 1997-2006
(2007)- et al.
The importance of emergency medicine in organ donation: successful donation is more likely when potential donors are referred from the emergency department
Acad Emerg Med
(2009)
Organ donation breakthrough collaborative: increasing organ donation through system redesign
Crit Care Nurs
Kidney retrieval after sudden out of hospital refractory cardiac arrest: a cohort of uncontrolled non heart beating donors
Crit Care
Victims of cardiac arrest occurring outside the hospital: a source of transplantable kidneys
Ann Intern Med
Application of an automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation device for kidney transplantation from uncontrolled donation after cardiac death donors in the emergency department
Clin Transplant
Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action
Role of the accident and emergency department in the non-heart-beating donor programme in Leicester
J Accid Emerg Med
Current situation of donation after circulatory death in European countries
Transpl Int
City to explore a way to add organ donors
Project to get transplant organs from ER patients raises ethics questions
Success of organ donation after out-of-hospital cardiac death and the barriers to its acceptance
Crit Care
LifeNet Health quarterly newsletter
Ethical, psychosocial, and public policy implications of procuring organs from non-heart-beating cadaver donors
JAMA
Cited by (16)
Ethical considerations in the use of pre-mortem interventions to support deceased organ donation: A scoping review
2021, Transplantation ReviewsCitation Excerpt :The impact of a previously registered decision to donate was frequently mentioned, and some viewed this prior expressed wish to imply acceptance of low risk PMIs to facilitate donation [47,62,65,93,94]. However, the most common position was that prior consent to donation did not include consent to PMIs [25,45,63,95,96] and that informed consent should be sought from SDMs [6,25,38,42,95,97,98]. All included protocols and clinical recommendations recommended separate and informed consent for all procedures prior to death [1,8,99].
Enabling Donation after Cardiac Death in the Emergency Department: Overcoming Clinical, Legal, and Ethical Concerns
2017, Journal of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :But if donation was consistent with the patient's wishes, perhaps autonomy and the object of the autonomous preference, that is, donation for another individual, may trump nonmaleficence (11). Addressing both concerns about justice and harm, Michael puts forth that without temporary organ preservation, the opportunity to donate would be lost, and individuals who are later found to have wanted to become organ donors will not have had their last wish upheld (12). Bell notes that “if society, and indeed the medical profession, is to wholeheartedly subscribe to this process and achieve this ethical ‘good,’ the above inconsistencies, ambiguities, and irregularities need to be eliminated, clarified, or endorsed in an explicit, transparent format” (13).
The bioethical debate on organ donation: Does it end when the heart stops beating?
2015, Ethique et SanteEnd of life/palliative care/ethics
2014, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Ethics consults are rarely placed from the ED, mostly because of time constraints; but this may be an underused resource. There are more than 100,000 individuals awaiting organ transplant in the United States, and less than one-third of them will get an organ each year.89 Organ donation typically occurs by one of 2 processes: (1) after brain death (which in most states equals death) but before ventilator and supportive medications have been discontinued (more common) or (2) by donation after cardiac death (DCD).
Organ donation and the emergency department: Ethically appropriate and legally supported
2014, Journal of Emergency MedicineUncontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death protocols: Ethical challenges and suggestions for improvement
2013, Annals of Emergency Medicine
A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.
Supervising editor: Robert K. Knopp, MD
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist.
Publication date: Available online June 13, 2012.