ArticlesPrediction of potential for organ donation after cardiac death in patients in neurocritical state: a prospective observational study
Introduction
Donation after cardiac death (DCD) protocols allow families of patients who are dying but not brain dead to donate organs. Such protocols have been implemented in many countries and might reduce the shortage of available organs for transplantation.1 After withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST), DCD allows organ procurement in an operating room after irreversible cessation of respiration and circulation has been declared.2 Although such donation contributes an increasing proportion of viable organs for transplantation, identification of appropriate candidates is a restricting factor.
Patients with catastrophic, irreversible brain injury who do not meet criteria for brain death are the most frequent candidates for DCD,3, 4, 5 but about half of these patients continue to breathe and maintain circulation for more than 60 min after WLST.6 The success of DCD relies on identification of patients who are most likely to die within 60 min of WLST. Prolongation of the withdrawal phase of warm ischaemia time (ie, the time between WLST and end of cardiopulmonary function) beyond 60 min can compromise organ function.2, 7 Thus, most DCD protocols do not continue with organ retrieval if the patient is still alive 60 min after WLST.8 However, good outcomes have been reported with organ transplants (particularly kidneys) retrieved after up to 4 h of warm ischaemia.9, 10
Available scores used by organ-procurement organisations to estimate the time to death after WLST, such as the Wisconsin criteria3 or the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) criteria,4 include little information about the neurological status of the patient before WLST. Calculation of these scores requires temporary disconnection of the patient from the mechanical ventilator and the scores are tailored to assess the degree of pulmonary and circulatory support. These variables might be of less prognostic value in patients with catastrophic neurological injury who have not progressed to brain death than in patients with major non-neurological injury. This notion was reinforced by our previous analysis6 in which several respiratory and haemodynamic parameters were associated with death within 60 min of WLST on univariate analyses, but not on the multivariable analysis that included elements of a neurological examination. This single-centre study6 of 149 patients who were in coma with irreversible brain injury suggested that, after WLST, four clinical variables were associated with death within 60 min of extubation: absent corneal reflex, absent cough reflex, extensor or absent motor response, and higher oxygenation index. These associations were confirmed subsequently in a smaller, independent cohort.11
To further validate this approach, we undertook a prospective study to produce a new model to predict death within 60 min of WLST in patients with catastrophic cerebral damage, which was based on the previously described clinical variables. We aimed to develop a practical score for assessment of potential candidates for DCD.
Section snippets
Study design and participants
In this multicentre, observational study, we prospectively obtained data from consecutive adult, comatose patients with irreversible brain damage who underwent WLST at the intensive care units of six participating centres in the USA and the Netherlands. We enrolled patients in the study if anticipated death was attributable directly to severe brain injury (eg, massive head trauma, intracranial haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke with malignant oedema, or anoxic damage after cardiorespiratory arrest).
Results
Between March 30, 2010, and April 1, 2011, we assessed 178 patients. Table 1 summarises baseline characteristics of our study population. We enrolled 70 patients at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester (MN, USA), 39 at the Erasmus MC University Medical Center in Rotterdam (Netherlands), 30 at the University of Cincinnati (OH, USA), 17 at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville (FL, USA), 12 at Washington University in St Louis (MO, USA), and ten at the University of California, San Francisco (CA, USA).
82
Discussion
When the decision to proceed with WLST is reached, medical teams in many countries contact local organ-procurement organisations to address the possibility of organ donation. In these situations, reliable identification of appropriate DCD candidates is essential for all concerned. Because catastrophic brain injury is the most common cause of death in patients who might be suitable for DCD, such methods should be especially applicable to patients in neurocritical state. In this study, we
References (16)
- et al.
Organ donation and utilization in the United States: 1998–2007
Am J Transplant
(2009) - et al.
Report of a national conference on donation after cardiac death
Am J Transplant
(2006) - et al.
Donors after cardiac death: validation of identification criteria (DVIC) study for predictors of rapid death
Am J Transplant
(2008) - et al.
Time to cardiac death after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in potential organ donors
Am J Transplant
(2009) - et al.
Expansion of the kidney donor pool by using cardiac death donors with prolonged time to cardiorespiratory arrest
Am J Transplant
(2011) - et al.
Donation after circulatory death
Br J Anaesth
(2012) - et al.
Predictors of time to death after terminal withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in the ICU
Chest
(2010) - et al.
Development of the University of Wisconsin donation after cardiac death evaluation tool
Prog Transplant
(2003)
Cited by (60)
Questions From Family Members During the Dying Process And Moral Distress Experienced by ICU Nurses
2024, Journal of Pain and Symptom ManagementDonation after circulatory death: A transplant cardiologist's take on neuroprognostication
2023, Journal of Heart and Lung TransplantationThe Future of heart procurement with donation after circulatory death: Current practice and opportunities for advancement
2022, Journal of Heart and Lung TransplantationControlled DCD lung transplantation: Circumventing imagined and real barriers—time for an international taskforce?
2022, Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation