Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 58, Issue 7, April 2004, Pages 1405-1413
Social Science & Medicine

Parental perspectives on vaccinating children against sexually transmitted infections

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00335-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Several vaccines for sexually transmitted infections (STI) are presently in development and the eventual availability of such vaccines is expected to result in the prevention of a significant number of burdensome conditions. Young adolescents are presumed to be likely targets for these vaccines since adolescents’ risk for STI increases as they age and become sexually active. It is unclear, however, to what extent parents will agree to having adolescents receive STI vaccines. Inasmuch as acceptance is the foundation for effective immunization programs, an understanding of parental perspectives about this issue is required to inform future STI vaccine program strategies.

This paper presents findings from a qualitative study that used in-depth interviews to elicit attitudes from 34 parents about accepting vaccines for genital herpes, human immunodeficiency virus, human papillomavirus and gonorrhea for their children (aged 8–17). Data were collected from parents bringing their children for care at an urban clinic and a suburban private office. Content analysis of the responses revealed that most parents (>70%) approved the administration of all four of the STI vaccines proposed. Parents’ reasons for acceptance included wanting to protect their children, being concerned about specific disease characteristics, and previous experience with the infections. Parents who declined the vaccines did so primarily because they perceived their children to be at low risk for the infections or they had low concern about features of the diseases. Most parents thought they should be the decision-maker regarding children receiving an STI vaccine. Results from this study will be used to plan subsequent investigations of the determinants of STI vaccine acceptance by parents.

Introduction

Currently, hepatitis B vaccine is the only vaccine available that prevents a sexually transmitted infection (STI). However, a number of other STI vaccines are in various stages of development and testing, including those for the prevention of chlamydia (CT), gonorrhea (GC), genital herpes, human papillomavirus (HPV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (Barbosa-Cesnik, Gerbase, & Heymann, 1997; Hines, Ghim, & Jenson, 1998; Koutsky et al., 2002; Letvin, 1998; McLean et al., 1994; Stanberry et al., 2002). These are all infections for which the health and economic costs are enormous. For example, chlamydia infection can cause sterility in females; genital herpes is painful and, if transmitted to a newborn, can be life-threatening; and gonorrhea, if left untreated, can cause infections in other parts of the body. The progression of HIV infection into the fatal disease of AIDS is well known; however, HPV has become recognized as a key factor in the development of another life-threatening disease, cervical cancer. Therefore, it is clear that, once developed and made available, STI vaccines would have the potential to be invaluable tools for disease prevention (Stratton, Durch, & Lawrence, 2000).

Adolescents have been identified as a group at risk for STI because of high rates of sexual intercourse, inconsistent condom use, and multiple sexual partners (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002). In fact, research has documented that adolescents as a group are infected disproportionately with STIs, such as syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia (Burstein et al., 1998). Early adolescents and preadolescents, therefore, would be excellent candidates for STI immunization. Further, there are several reasons that parents of adolescents are ideal participants in a study of STI vaccine acceptability. Firstly, research indicates that parents and their adolescent children agree that parents should have the authority to decide about health-related issues (Smetana, 1994). In addition, a study found that the best predictor of hepatitis B vaccine acceptance among adolescents was their perception that parents believed hepatitis B vaccination was important (Rosenthal, Kottenhahn, Biro, & Succop, 1995).

In light of these issues and the likely requirement for parents to consent for STI immunization of their children, the evaluation of parental attitudes will be central to understanding determinants of STI vaccine acceptance. This article presents findings from a qualitative study that used in-depth individual interviews to explore parents’ attitudes toward vaccines for genital herpes, HIV, HPV, and gonorrhea (GC) for their children. An understanding of these attitudes will be useful in informing educational interventions to promote the acceptance of STI vaccines once they become accessible to the public.

Section snippets

Potential challenges associated with STI vaccine acceptance

Studies of existing safe and effective vaccines (e.g., influenza, hepatitis B, and pertussis) repeatedly find inadequate acceptance of immunization among individuals most at risk for these conditions (Barie, Dellinger, Dougherty, & Fink, 1994; Bates, Fitzgerald, Dittus, & Wolinsky, 1994; Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, 1998; Fedson, 1994; Zimet, Kee, Winston, Perkins & Maharry, 2001). These findings suggest that the mere availability of safe and effective STI vaccines will not ensure

Determinants of adolescent vaccine acceptance

Studies which have examined adolescent acceptance of STI vaccines in development have found relatively high levels of acceptance by individuals in this age group (Rosenthal et al., 1995; Zimet, Fortenberry, & Blythe, 1999; Zimet, Blythe, & Fortenberry, 2000; Zimet et al., 2000). However, degree of acceptance was influenced by characteristics of the vaccine (e.g., cost, efficacy, etc.), adolescents’ health beliefs, and provider recommendations. To date there has been little research on

Setting, respondents and methods

This was the first phase of an ongoing study to understand determinants of parent attitudes about STI vaccines for their children. This exploratory phase involved individual semi-structured interviews with parents. The data were collected in Marion County, Indiana, a Midwestern metropolitan community of approximately one million residents. From January to June 2000 parents were recruited from two pediatric primary care sites: a suburban private practice and an urban hospital clinic These sites

Description of respondents and their decisions about vaccines

Thirty-eight parents were approached about participating in the study and four refused, resulting in a participation rate of 89%. The respondents consisted of 34 parents aged 26–55 years who were presenting their children for health care. Twenty-nine were mothers or female guardians. Five were fathers or male guardians. The children's ages ranged from 8 to 17 years; 18 of the children were male and 16 were female. Twenty-four parents identified themselves as white and 10 as African-American. A

Conclusion and discussion

Parents’ overall acceptance rates of STI vaccines for pre-adolescent and adolescent children were high for all of the four infections. Parents who were less well educated and attending urban clinics were more likely to accept these vaccines for their children. Parents’ reasons for accepting STI vaccines related primarily to desiring to prevent or protect their children from acquiring the infections. These decisions were related to perceptions of disease severity and personal experience. Such

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the parents and pediatric offices for their participation, Bonnie Webster for her assistance with the interviews and transcription, and Amy Centofante for her assistance with coding the interviews. This study was funded by grants from Indiana University School of Nursing at Indianapolis and NIH (U19 AI31494).

References (38)

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2002). Trends in sexual risk behaviors among high school students—United...
  • R.J. Donovan et al.

    Positive versus negative framing of a hypothetical infant immunizationThe influence of involvement

    Health Education and Behavior

    (2000)
  • A.B. Elster et al.

    AMA guidelines for adolescent preventive services (GAPS)

    (1994)
  • D.S. Fedson

    Adult immunizationSummary of the national vaccine advisory committee report

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1994)
  • J.D. Fortenberry et al.

    Relationships of stigma and shame to gonorrhea and HIV screening

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2002)
  • M. Green et al.

    Bright futuresGuidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents

    (2002)
  • G.M. Herek et al.

    HIV-related stigma and knowledge in the United StatesPrevalence and trends, 1991–1999

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2002)
  • J.F. Hines et al.

    Prospects for human papillomavirus vaccine developmentEmerging HPV vaccines

    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1998)
  • J. Jaccard et al.

    Parent-adolescent congruency in reports of adolescent sexual behavior and in communications about sexual behavior

    Child Development

    (1998)
  • Cited by (184)

    • Cancer-salient messaging for Human Papillomavirus vaccine uptake: A randomized controlled trial

      2018, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Parental decisions to vaccinate their children, specifically with the HPV vaccine, can be tied to multiple behavioral constructs. These include perceived susceptibility of HPV infection (is my child at risk of infection), perceived benefit, and perceived severity (of disease, and of vaccine related adverse events) [14,15]. This would suggest that messaging surrounding the HPV vaccine should be highly salient within these constructs.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text