Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 346, Issue 8972, 12 August 1995, Pages 407-410
The Lancet

Inpatient general medicine is evidence based

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92781-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Summary

For many years clinicians have had to cope with the accusation that only 10-20% of the treatments they provide have any scientific foundation. Their interventions, in other words, are seldom "evidence based". Is the profession guilty as charged?

In April, 1995, a general medical team at a university-affiliated district hospital in Oxford, UK, studied the treatments given to all 109 patients managed during that month on whom a diagnosis had been reached. Medical sources (including databases) were then searched for randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence that the treatments were effective. The 109 primary treatments were then classified: 82% were evidence based (ie, there was RCT support [53%] or unanimity on the team about the existence of convincing non-experimental evidence [29%]). This study, which needs to be repeated in other clinical settings and for other disciplines, suggests that earlier pessimism over the extent to which evidence-based medicine is already practised is misplaced.

References (38)

  • Office of Technology Assessment of the Congress of the United States

    Assessing the efficacy and safety of medical technologies

    (1978)
  • Office of Technology Assessment of the Congress of the United States

    The impact of randomised clinical trials on health policy and medical practice

    (1983)
  • Jw Williamson et al.

    Medical Practice Information Demonstration Project: final report

    (1979)
  • M. Dubinsky et al.

    Analysis of the National Institutes of Health Medicare Coverage Assessment

    Int J Technol Assess Health Care

    (1990)
  • K. Dickersin et al.

    Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews

    BMJ

    (1994)
  • Hm Lee et al.

    The critically appraised topic: a standardized aid for the presentation and storage of evidence-based medicine

    Clin Res

    (1993)
  • Ja Cairns et al.

    Aspirin, sulfinpyrazone, or both in unstable angina

    N Engl J Med

    (1985)
  • RISC Group

    Risk of myocardial infarction and death during treatment with low dose aspirin and intravenous heparin in men with unstable coronary artery disease

    Lancet

    (1990)
  • Cited by (369)

    • Recent Levels of Evidence in Otolaryngology Journals

      2023, Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text