Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 377, Issue 9761, 15–21 January 2011, Pages 209-218
The Lancet

Articles
Effect of circumcision of HIV-negative men on transmission of human papillomavirus to HIV-negative women: a randomised trial in Rakai, Uganda

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61967-8Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Randomised trials show that male circumcision reduces the prevalence and incidence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in men. We assessed the efficacy of male circumcision to reduce prevalence and incidence of high-risk HPV in female partners of circumcised men.

Methods

In two parallel but independent randomised controlled trials of male circumcision, we enrolled HIV-negative men and their female partners between 2003 and 2006, in Rakai, Uganda. With a computer-generated random number sequence in blocks of 20, men were assigned to undergo circumcision immediately (intervention) or after 24 months (control). HIV-uninfected female partners (648 of men from the intervention group, and 597 of men in the control group) were simultaneously enrolled and provided interview information and self-collected vaginal swabs at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months. Vaginal swabs were tested for high-risk HPV by Roche HPV Linear Array. Female HPV infection was a secondary endpoint of the trials, assessed as the prevalence of high-risk HPV infection 24 months after intervention and the incidence of new infections during the trial. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. An as-treated analysis was also done to account for study-group crossovers. The trials were registered, numbers NCT00425984 and NCT00124878.

Findings

During the trial, 18 men in the control group underwent circumcision elsewhere, and 31 in the intervention group did not undergo circumcision. At 24-month follow-up, data were available for 544 women in the intervention group and 488 in the control group; 151 (27·8%) women in the intervention group and 189 (38·7%) in the control group had high-risk HPV infection (prevalence risk ratio=0·72, 95% CI 0·60–0·85, p=0·001). During the trial, incidence of high-risk HPV infection in women was lower in the intervention group than in the control group (20·7 infections vs 26·9 infections per 100 person-years; incidence rate ratio=0·77, 0·63–0·93, p=0·008).

Interpretation

Our findings indicate that male circumcision should now be accepted as an efficacious intervention for reducing the prevalence and incidence of HPV infections in female partners. However, protection is only partial; the promotion of safe sex practices is also important.

Funding

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, National Institutes of Health, and Fogarty International Center.

Introduction

Infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is common in sexually active individuals, especially in developing countries.1 HPV infection can cause genital warts, and high-risk genotypes cause penile and anal cancers in men, and cervical cancer in women.1, 2 Cervical cancer is the third most common cancer in women worldwide.3 More than 85% of the HPV disease burden is in developing countries, and cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in women in east Africa.3

Three randomised trials, done in Uganda,4 Kenya,5 and South Africa,6 showed that male circumcision substantially decreased the risk of HIV acquisition in men. These trials reported that male circumcision also reduced the prevalence of penile high-risk HPV infection by about 35%,7, 8 reduced the acquisition of new high-risk HPV infections, and increased clearance of pre-existing high-risk HPV infection in men without HIV infection.9 We have also reported10 that, compared with female partners of uncircumcised men, female partners of circumcised men had lower rates of genital ulcer disease, Trichomonas vaginalis infection, and bacterial vaginosis. However, male circumcision did not reduce the rate of HIV transmission from men with HIV to their female partners.11

In several observational studies, female partners of circumcised men were found to have a substantially reduced risk of cervical neoplasia,12, 13, 14 but findings are not consistent.15, 16 Many of these observational studies were small, were vulnerable to confounding by sexual behaviours in men and women, and assessed male circumcision status by self-report or the female partners' report, which could have affected the validity of data. Moreover, the long latent interval between initial infection with high-risk HPV and the development of cervical neoplasia complicates causal inferences from retrospective data for previous exposures. Because infection with high-risk HPV is a necessary precondition for cervical neoplasia,17 the potential efficacy of male circumcision for the prevention of cervical neoplasia can best be assessed in randomised controlled trials of male circumcision that measure incidence, prevalence, and clearance of high-risk HPV infection in female partners of men randomly assigned circumcision immediately or after a delay. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of male circumcision to prevent high-risk HPV infection in HIV-negative female partners of HIV-negative men who were enrolled in two randomised controlled trials of male circumcision in Rakai, Uganda.

Section snippets

Study design and participants

Two parallel but independent trials of male circumcision for the prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections were done in Rakai, Uganda, as previously described.4, 7, 10, 11, 18 Both trials began enrolment of participants in September, 2003. The first trial enrolled 4996 uncircumcised men who did not have HIV infection and were between 15 and 49 years old. The primary aim was to assess the effectiveness of male circumcision for the prevention of HIV infection; secondary aims

Results

The trial profile is given in the figure. Of the 2786 men in the intervention group who did not have HIV infection at enrolment, 1357 (49%) reported that they were married or in a consensual relationship with a total of 1463 women (mean=1·08 female partners per man). Of the 2810 men in the control group who did not have HIV infection at enrolment, 1349 (48%) reported that they were married or in a consensual relationship with a total of 1429 women (mean=1·06 female partners per man).

Because of

Discussion

Circumcision of adolescent and adult men in a rural Ugandan population significantly reduced the prevalence and incidence of both low-risk and high-risk HPV infections and increased clearance of high-risk HPV infections in their female partners. The efficacy of male circumcision for reducing high-risk HPV prevalence in female partners during the 2-year follow-up was 28%. Our finding of lower prevalence of high-risk HPV infections in female partners of circumcised men than in female partners of

References (30)

  • RH Gray et al.

    Male circumcision decreases acquisition and increases clearance of high-risk human papillomavirus in HIV-negative men: a randomized trial in Rakai, Uganda

    J Infect Dis

    (2010)
  • RH Gray et al.

    The effects of male circumcision on female partners' genital tract symptoms and vaginal infections in a randomized trial in Rakai, Uganda

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2009)
  • PK Drain et al.

    Male circumcision, religion, and infectious diseases: an ecologic analysis of 118 developing countries

    BMC Infect Dis

    (2006)
  • X Castellsague et al.

    Male circumcision, penile human papillomavirus infection, and cervical cancer in female partners

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • SK Kjaer et al.

    Case-control study of risk factors for cervical neoplasia in Denmark—I: role of the “male factor” in women with one lifetime sexual partner

    Int J Cancer

    (1991)
  • Cited by (143)

    • Prevention and Screening of HPV Malignancies

      2021, Seminars in Radiation Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Male circumcision is known to reduce the risk of contracting HIV, but it also reduces the risk of HPV infection and penile cancer.41,42 In addition to its direct benefit for males, circumcision may also prevent HPV transmission to sex partners, a finding confirmed in prospective clinical trials.43,44 Cervical cancer is particularly well-suited to screening because the period from initial infection with an oncogenic HPV type to the development of cancer spans many years, and invasive cancer is preceded by an identifiable precursor lesion.45

    • Estimating incidence rates of grouped HPV types: A systematic review and comparison of the impact of different epidemiological assumptions

      2019, Papillomavirus Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Table 3 shows the approach the authors used to estimate IR in their study. Of the 57 articles, 22 [32–53], one [22], and two [23,25] used approaches A, B and C respectively, and six [54–59], one [21], and five [24,26,28–30] articles used approaches D, E and F respectively. One study used both approaches B and E [19] and two studies used both C and F [4,20].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Joint first authors.

    View full text