Elsevier

Physiotherapy

Volume 83, Issue 2, February 1997, Pages 90-96
Physiotherapy

SCHOLARLY PAPER
Confidentiality and HIV Status

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)65585-XGet rights and content

Summary

Confidentiality is an important ethical principle within health care. In order for confidential information to be revealed, it has to be shown that there are legitimate reasons favouring disclosure which significantly outweigh those supporting confidentiality. This paper examines whether or not such reasons exist in respect of the HIV status of both physiotherapists and patients.

Physiotherapists might argue that they need to know if their patients are seropositive, either for the purposes of effective treatment or in order to protect themselves from infection. It is argued that neither of these constitute a ‘need to know’. Except when progression to AIDS has occurred (in which case the diagnosis will be known to the therapist), a patient's HIV status does not determine the choice or effectiveness of therapy. Equally, the adoption of universal precautions provides optimum protection against transmission of HIV, and does not depend on a knowledge of who is or is not seropositive.

Patients might wish to know whether or not their physiotherapist is HIV-positive. The sort of therapeutic interaction that occurs between therapist and patient creates an infinitely small risk of HIV transmission, and cannot therefore overturn the presumption of confidentiality. The anxieties which may be felt by some therapists and patients on this issue are best allayed by a process of education and attitude change, not by inappropriate and purposeless breaches of confidentiality.

References (59)

  • Armstrong-EstherC et al.

    ‘The effect of education on nurses’ perceptions of AIDS’

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (1990)
  • AtchisonBJ et al.

    ‘Occupational therapy personnel and AIDS: Attitudes, knowledge, and fears’

    American Journal of Occupational Therapy

    (1990)
  • BaklandLK et al.

    ‘Health care professionals’ role in the treatment of AIDS’

  • BeauchampTL et al.

    Principles of Biomedical Ethics

    (1994)
  • BlendonRJ et al.

    ‘Discrimination against people with AIDS’

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1988)
  • BoydK

    ‘HIV infection and AIDS: the ethics of medical confidentiality’

    Journal of Medical Ethics

    (1992)
  • BrissetteM et al.

    ‘PTs and AIDS knowledge’

    Clinical Management

    (1990)
  • British Medical Association

    Medical Ethics Today: Its practice and philosophy

    (1993)
  • Chartered Society of Physiotherapy

    Rules of Professional Conduct

    (1996)
  • CiesielskiC et al.

    ‘Transmission of human immunodeficiency virus in a dental practice’

    Annals of Internal Medicine

    (1992)
  • DudleyHAF et al.

    ‘AIDS: A bill of rights for the surgical team?’

    British Medical Journal

    (1988)
  • ElderHA

    ‘Transmission of HIV and prevention of AIDS’

  • EmanuelEJ

    ‘Do physicians have an obligation to treat patients with AIDS?’

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1988)
  • ErridgeP

    ‘The rights of HIV infected healthcare workers’

    British Medical Journal

    (1996)
  • Falk-KesslerJ et al.

    ‘Mandatory HIV testing and occupational therapists’

    American Journal of Occupational Therapy

    (1994)
  • FanH et al.

    AIDS: Science and society

    (1996)
  • FowlerMDM et al.

    ‘Ethical and legal aspects’

  • FoxDM

    ‘The politics of physicians’ responsibility in epidemics’

  • GalantinoML

    ‘Cardiopulmonary complications in AIDS patients’

  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Julius Sim BA MSc PhD MCSP is a principal lecturer in the School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FP.

    View full text