Elsevier

Injury

Volume 30, Issue 3, April 1999, Pages 165-168
Injury

The association between seniority of Accident and Emergency doctor and outcome following trauma

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(98)00252-6Get rights and content

Abstract

The actual survival of patients treated following trauma in four Scottish Teaching hospitals during five years was compared with predicted survival according to TRISS analysis. The data were analysed according to the seniority of the Accident and Emergency (A&E) doctor treating each patient. The group of patients treated by a consultant had a significantly better outcome (p<0.05) than the group of patients treated by junior doctors. Analysis of outcome according to the grade of junior A&E doctor suggested a step-wise improvement in outcome with seniority, thus supporting the concept that an improved outcome is associated with experience and seniority. These results support calls for A&E consultants to be increasingly involved in the management of patients with major trauma. Such increased involvement would require an increase in the number of A&E consultants.

Introduction

Deficiencies in the management of patients with trauma in the UK have been well publicised and highlighted1, 2, 3. Retrospective review of 1000 deaths after trauma by the Royal College of Surgeons of England concluded that some deaths were unnecessary and that many were associated with delivery of emergency care by inexperienced doctors[1]. These conclusions were based upon subjective retrospective analysis of case notes, objective evidence based upon prospective data regarding the importance of experience of the resuscitating team is somewhat lacking.

The focus regarding the initial reception and resuscitation of the injured patient has naturally fallen upon the senior doctor (or resuscitating `team leader') in the Accident and Emergency (A&E) department. As a result, some hospitals in the UK have dramatically altered their A&E staffing levels and work patterns in order to increase the immediate availability of experienced doctors to manage seriously injured patents[4]. Unfortunately, attempting to elucidate the effect of the presence of senior staff within such hospitals is difficult5, 6. Comparing patients' outcomes with those in other hospitals yields information about the effectiveness of different systems of care within two different hospitals, which may be influenced by numerous other factors apart from differences in seniority of accident and emergency staff5, 6. In order to try to investigate the way in which the level of seniority of accident and emergency (A&E) doctor influences outcome after trauma, different cohorts of patients treated within the same hospitals need to be compared.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

The trauma care delivered in four Scottish hospitals (Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Glasgow Western Infirmary and Glasgow Royal Infirmary) was studied prospectively by the Scottish Trauma Audit Group between February 1992 and December 1996. Criteria for inclusion in the study were those used previously by the Major Trauma Outcome Study, which specifically exclude children aged less than 13 years and elderly patients with isolated (osteoporotic) neck of femur fractures or

Results

The 1208 patients treated by an A&E consultant had a significantly better outcome than the 9195 patients treated by junior staff (Fig. 1). Although significantly (p<0.01) more patients seen by a consultant presented to A&E during `normal' working hours (Monday–Friday, 9 a.m.–5 p.m.), analysis of outcome according to time of presentation revealed that the difference in outcome associated with consultant presence was more exaggerated outside than during `normal working hours' (Fig. 2). Further

Discussion

The organisation of trauma services in the UK remains controversial5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14. There have been calls for every hospital which manages seriously injured patients to install trauma teams comprising experienced doctors15, 16, 17. Improved outcome might be intuitively anticipated when patients with potentially life threatening emergencies are managed by trained and experienced doctors, but proving this is not easy. A randomised controlled trial of treatment by A&E consultants against

Acknowledgements

We thank the Scottish Trauma Audit Group for help with this study. J.W. was funded by a University of Edinburgh Faculty of Medicine Research Fellowship.

References (19)

  • F.L.P. Heyes et al.

    Introduction of a trauma team to a district general hospital. The Brighton experience

    Injury

    (1991)
  • A.R. Kazemi et al.

    The existence and composition of Trauma Teams in the UK

    Injury

    (1997)
  • Royal College of Surgeons of England. The management of patients with major injuries. London: Royal College of...
  • I.D. Anderson et al.

    Retrospective study of 1000 deaths from injury in England and Wales

    Br. Med. J.

    (1988)
  • D.W. Yates et al.

    Preliminary analysis of the care of injured patients in 33 British hospitals: first report of the United Kingdom major trauma outcome study

    Br. Med. J.

    (1992)
  • A. Redmond et al.

    A trauma centre in the UK

    Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl.

    (1993)
  • Nicholl J, Turner J, Dixon S. The cost-effectiveness of the regional trauma centre in the North West Midlands....
  • J. Nicholl et al.

    Effectiveness of a regional trauma system in reducing mortality from major trauma: before and after study

    Br. Med. J.

    (1997)
  • S.P. Baker et al.

    The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care

    J. Trauma

    (1974)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (31)

  • Regional variation in the provision of major trauma services for the older injured patient

    2022, Injury
    Citation Excerpt :

    Early senior review is more effective, improving patient flow and decreasing length of stay [10]. Consultant delivered systems have demonstrate improved outcomes to patients and hospital processes [12–16]. This is not novel or contemporary, Wyatt et al. [12] for instance discussed patient outcome according to the grade of Emergency Department doctor [12].

  • Seniority of Emergency Physician, Patient Disposition and Outcome Following Disposition

    2016, American Journal of the Medical Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    The literature has shown that medical experience was influenced by seniority.12,13 Many studies have focused on the positive effect of seniority on the treatment of emergency department (ED) patients; an improved outcome was associated with experience and seniority in major trauma patients.10 Salazar et al14 found that replacing residents with physicians resulted in fewer laboratory tests and radiographs being ordered, and shorter stay lengths in the ED.

  • Can residents be effective trauma team leaders in a major trauma centre?

    2013, Injury
    Citation Excerpt :

    A single previous study showed that patients reviewed by a consultant had improved survival but this is a historic study prior to the implementation trauma teams or a regional trauma system.11 Studies examining the effect of seniority have compared consultants to very junior trainees, or trainees from other specialties,11,24,25 unlike the senior trainees in our study who have had the benefit of a robust team leader induction and training programme, consultant mentoring and supervision. Process measures such as time to diagnostic imaging or definitive treatment have been shown to improve following the institution of a trauma system.26,27

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text