Special Article
The “Competence” of Children: No Longer All or None

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-7138(09)60914-6Get rights and content

Traditionally, under a fixed age set by the state, the child existed as an essentially disenfranchised member of the community. Current developments are demanding a variability in our assignment of autonomous rights, forcing a concept of “variable” competency. The courts increasingly require guidance as to “maturity” and “judgment” of children in their capacity to speak for themselves. This paper attempts to define some of the general conditions that limit competence and begins the process of establishing some general guidelines to help in deciding when we ought to allow children to enter into the decision-making process in important areas concerning their lives and futures.

Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 21, 2:153–162, 1982.

REFERENCES (7)

  • W. Gaylin

    Who speaks for the helpless

    This Journal

    (1979)
  • W. Gaylin et al.

    Fetal politics

    Atlantic

    (1975)
  • L. Ledbetter

    Parents win custody of 5 members of Moon's church

    The New York Times

    (1977)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

A modified version of this paper will appear in Who Speaks for the Child: The Problems of Proxy Consent, Plenum Press, 1982.

The material was prepared with the joint support of the National Science Foundation, grant No. 0SS74-127.45, and the National Endowment for the Humanities.

View full text