Original article
Measuring patient and relative satisfaction with level or aggressiveness of care and involvement in care decisions in the context of life threatening illness

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00024-XGet rights and content

Abstract

The objective of the study was to develop valid and reliable discriminative indices which measure patient and relative satisfaction with two closely related aspects of medical care: the level of care received and their involvement in decisions regarding care. We generated items by literature review and interviews with patients, relatives, and health care providers. In the final questionnaires, we included the items identified most frequently as sources of dissatisfaction and rated most important by 102 patients and 153 relatives. To measure reliability and validity we administered the instruments to 105 patients and 75 relatives of competent patients and 89 relatives of incompetent patients. We constructed three questionnaires: the Patient Satisfaction Index with 23 items, the Relative of Competent Patient Satisfaction Index with 34 items, and the Relative of Incompetent Patient Satisfaction Index with 29 items. We found mean scores of 75–80% of the maximum possible score, with a wide range of scores. The intraclass correlation for the instruments varied from 0.86 to 0.94. Correlations with global ratings were high (0.59–0.75) and similar to predictions. Correlations with caregiver ratings were lower than predicted (0.18–0.22). For both patients and relatives, our instruments discriminate between those with higher and lower satisfaction with the level of medical care and with their involvement with decision-making.

References (31)

  • JE Ware et al.

    The measurement and meaning of patient satisfaction

    Health Med Care Serv Rev

    (1978)
  • J Hill et al.

    Survey of satisfaction with care in a rheumatology outpatient clinic

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (1992)
  • MD Stain et al.

    Factors associated with patient satisfaction among symptomatic HIV-infected persons

    Med Care

    (1993)
  • PD Cleary et al.

    Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care

    Inquiry

    (1988)
  • DW Molloy et al.

    Decision making in the incompetent elderly: The daughter from California syndrome

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1991)
  • Cited by (47)

    • Staff Training Interventions to Improve End-of-Life Care of Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review

      2021, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
      Citation Excerpt :

      It was assessed in 1 low-quality trial with intervention showing benefits.38 One study29 assessed satisfaction with care in living residents using the Relative and Patient Satisfaction Indexes64 without intervention effects in this outcome. The Discomfort Scale for Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type65 was used to evaluate symptoms in a single low-quality study with positive intervention effects.28

    • Impact of a Nurse-Led Advance Care Planning Intervention on Satisfaction, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Health Care Utilization Among Patients With Severe Respiratory Disease: A Randomized Patient-Preference Trial

      2020, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      This study reports on participant self-reported and clinical outcomes associated with allocation to the facilitated ACP intervention. Satisfaction with health care was assessed using the Patient Satisfaction Index, a validated 23-item survey instrument with questions covering satisfaction with health care professionals, involvement in health care decision making, and level of health care received during the previous three months.29 Response is via a seven-level Likert scale, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction (score range 23–161).

    • Patient reported outcome measures for spinal disorders

      2018, Seminars in Spine Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although, direct inquiries have been associated with greater satisfaction than indirect ones.50 Also, direct measures assess services received, or not received, more precisely.51 Factual measures focus on the facts of what actually occurred, whereas affective measures emphasize the patient’s perception of what occurred.

    • Measuring patient satisfaction with health care treatment using the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction measure delivered superior and robust satisfaction estimates

      2014, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      These instruments were chosen after detailed review of patient satisfaction theories and instruments [1]. The three generic measures were the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-18), which consists of 18 items assessing satisfaction with health care services [24]; the Consultation Satisfaction Questionnaire (ConsultSQ), which has 18 items assessing clinician consultations [23]; and the Patient Satisfaction Index (PSI), which has 23 items covering satisfaction with medical care [53]. The incontinence measure was the revised version of the Genito-Urinary Treatment Satisfaction Scale (GUTSS), which comprises eight items assessing satisfaction with treatment outcomes for urinary incontinence [14].

    • Improving the ICU: Part 1

      2005, Chest
      Citation Excerpt :

      There are numerous potential dimensions to such surveys in ICU care, including satisfaction with the following: (1) level of care from physicians, nurses, and other ancillary health-care personnel; (2) involvement in decisions regarding care; (3) amount and quality of communications with health-care and administrative personnel; (4) outcomes of care; (5) administrative hospital functions, such as admissions, discharges, and billing; (6) food; and (7) housekeeping. Although some have disputed the validity of currently used methods,129130 a variety of tools exist to measure these aspects of satisfaction, including some created specially for use in ICUs.10,12,72131,132,133134 The satisfaction of all those who work in an ICU is another key component of ICU performance.

    • Agreement among family members in their assessment of the quality of dying and death

      2004, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, it is difficult to capture the patient's perspective from family report, and the family members' perspectives may be influenced by grief and other emotions.1 Previous studies reveal potential difficulties in the accuracy of proxy reports.2–8 If family members are the source of information about the quality of the dying process, the extent of agreement among family members on quality ratings of key experiences needs to be documented and understood.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Professor Mitchell and Dr Molloy are Career Scientists of the Ontario Ministry of Health.

    View full text