Physical restraint procedures for managing challenging behaviours presented by mentally retarded adults and children

https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(95)00036-4Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper reviews the published research literature on the use of physical restraint with mentally retarded adults and children. Research on three types of restraint is included. One type involves one or more person(s) holding another. A second method is where a mechanical device is fitted to limit movement or reduce injury. The third type is where the person voluntarily applies a personal or mechanical restraint. The following conclusions emerged: (a) there are numerous processes which contribute to the outcomes associated with restraint, and these are poorly understood; (b) different processes mediate the outcomes for contingent and noncontingent restraint; (c) both noncontingent and contingent restraint can result in long-term reductions in target behaviours, especially when fading procedures are employed (noncontingent restraint) and where staff or carers are involved in the treatment plan (contingent restraint); (d) self-restraint seems to be maintained by the reinforcing effects of the restraint procedure or by escape from the aversive consequences of self-injury; (e) there are (negative) reinforcing consequences for staff who use restraint procedures in service settings; (f) and both staff and clients risk injury, especially from emergency or unplanned restraint.

References (47)

  • R.A. Barkely et al.

    Reduction of stereotypic body contortions using physical restraint and DRO

    Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

    (1976)
  • L.E. Barton et al.

    Reduction of stereotyping behaviours using differential reinforcement procedures and momentary restraint

    Journal of Mental Deficiency Research

    (1985)
  • S.C. Bitgood et al.

    Immobilization effects and side effects on stereotyped behaviour in children

    Behaviour Modification

    (1980)
  • S.C. Bitgood et al.

    Reducing out-of-seat behaviour in developmentally disabled children through brief immobilization

    Education and Treatment of Children

    (1982)
  • Counsel and Care

    What if they hurt themselves; A discussion document on the uses and abuses of restraint in residential care and nursing homes for older people

    (1992)
  • M.F. Dorsey et al.

    Protective equipment; continuous and contingent application in the treatment of self-injurious behaviour

    Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis

    (1982)
  • J.E. Favell et al.

    The use of physical restraint in the treatment of self-injury and as positive reinforcement

    Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis

    (1978)
  • J.E. Favell et al.

    Physical restraint as positive reinforcement

    American Journal of Mental Deficiency

    (1981)
  • P. Gerhardt et al.

    Social policy on the use of aversive interventions; empirical, legal and ethical considerations

    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

    (1991)
  • J.A. Higenbottam et al.

    Sound induced drive, prior motion restraint and reduced sensory stimulation effects on rocking behaviour in retarded persons

    American Journal of Mental Deficiency

    (1975)
  • J. Hill et al.

    Staff injury rates associated with the implementation of contingent restraint

    Mental Retardation

    (1987)
  • R.H. Horner et al.

    The effects of response efficiency on equivalent competing behaviours

    Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis

    (1991)
  • J. Infantino et al.

    Assaults and injuries among staff with and without training in aggression control techniques

    Hospital and Community Psychiatry

    (1985)
  • Cited by (0)

    Preparation of this paper was supported by a grant from the Department of Health, U.K.

    View full text