Elsevier

Resuscitation

Volume 31, Issue 3, June 1996, Pages 255-263
Resuscitation

Review paper
Reporting approval by research ethics committees and subjects' consent in human resuscitation research

https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9572(95)00928-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To determine how frequently reports of research in human cardiopulmonary resuscitation mention approval by a research ethics committee and address subjects' consent. Methods: Retrospective review of published reports of interventional research in human cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Reports were retrieved from the MEDLINE database and selected according to pre-established criteria. Data were abstracted independently by the two authors with differences resolved by mutual agreement. Results were analyzed according to whether the research took place in the prehospital setting, the emergency department, or the hospital; whether it was conducted within or outside the United States; whether it received any funding from the US government; its randomization scheme; the year of publication; and whether the journal's instructions required mention of REC approval or subjects' consent. Results: Reports of 47 studies met our criteria for inclusion. Of these, 24 (51%) mentioned approval by a research ethics committee and 12 (26%) addressed subjects' consent. Significantly more studies reported ethics committee approval or addressed consent during more recent years. Authors were more likely to report consent, REC approval, or both when journal instructions required that REC approval be mentioned. Conclusion: Reports of resuscitation research have not consistently mentioned approval from a research ethics committee or addressed subjects' consent for interventional studies using human subjects. However, they are doing so more frequently in recent years as journal requirements for reporting change. REC approval is now almost always being reported, but subjects' consent is often not addressed. Journal editors and reviewers should ensure that authors adhere to the journal's instructions about reporting ethical conduct of experiments.

References (73)

  • GB Martin et al.

    Verapamil in the treatment of asystolic and pulseless idioventricular rhythm cardiopulmonary arrests: a preliminary report

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1984)
  • SR Shea et al.

    Prehospital endotracheal tube airway or esophageal gastric tube airway: a critical comparison

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1985)
  • E Barthell et al.

    Prehospital external cardiac pacing: a prospective, controlled clinical trial

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1988)
  • LM Turner et al.

    A comparison of epinephrine and methoxamine for resuscitation from electromechanical dissociation in human beings

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1988)
  • KR Ward et al.

    A comparison of interposed abdominal compression CPR and standard CPR by monitoring end-tidal PCO2

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1989)
  • DW Olson et al.

    Randomized study of epinephrine versus methoxamine in prehospital ventricular fibrillation

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1989)
  • KR Ward et al.

    A comparison of chest compressions between mechanical and manual CPR by monitoring endtidal PCO2 during human cardiac arrest

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1993)
  • IF Goldenberg et al.

    Esophageal gastric tube airway vs endotracheal tube in prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest

    Chest

    (1986)
  • M Frass et al.

    Ventilation with the esophageal tracheal combitube in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Promptness and effectiveness

    Chest

    (1988)
  • KJ Tucker et al.

    Active compression-decompression resuscitation: analysis of transmitral flow and left ventricular volume by transesophageal echocardiography in humans. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Working Group

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1993)
  • DN Quinton et al.

    Comparison of endotracheal and peripheral intravenous adrenaline in cardiac arrest. Is the endotracheal route reliable?

    Lancet

    (1987)
  • JP Morgan et al.

    High-energy versus low-energy defibrillation: experience in patients (excluding those in the intensive care unit) at Mayo Clinic-affiliated hospitals

  • J Jakobsson et al.

    Clinical experience with three different defibrillators for resuscitation of out of hospital cardiac arrest

    Resuscitation

    (1990)
  • T Schneider et al.

    Early defibrillation by emergency physicians or emergency medical technicians? A controlled, prospective multi-centre study

    Resuscitation

    (1994)
  • DT Kim et al.

    A retrospective analysis of institutional review board and informed consent practices in EMS research

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1994)
  • K Dickersin et al.

    Perusing the literature: comparison of MEDLINE searching with a perinatal trials database

    Controlled Clin Trials

    (1985)
  • T Poynard et al.

    The retrieval of randomized clinical trials in liver disease from the medical literature: a comparison of MEDLARS and manual methods

    Controlled Clin Trials

    (1985)
  • The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research

    The Belmont Report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of researdh

    OPRR Reports

    (April 18, 1979)
  • RJ Levine

    Research ethics committees

  • World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki

    Recommendations guiding medical doctors in biomedical research involving human subjects

  • 45 CFR Section...
  • 21 CFR Section...
  • 45 CFR Section...
  • 21 CFR Section...
  • The Nuremberg Code

  • 45 CFR Section...
  • Cited by (31)

    • Contributory factors to the evolution of the concept and practice of informed consent in clinical research: A narrative review

      2020, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      In 1997, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), a group of medical and biomedical journals produced a report, advocating for a transparent publication policy regarding IC and ethical approval, and clear reporting where these have taken place [54]. Olson's review of cardiopulmonary studies from the MEDLINE database in 1996 found that only 26% addressed the issue of IC, however practice improved in more recent studies [55]. A later report of 60 randomly selected clinical trial reports from six leading medical journals published before and after 1997, showed an increase from 64% to 82% in describing IC, suggesting the indirect power of medical journals to influence researcher's practices [56].

    • Tiny tweaks, big changes: An alternative strategy to empower ethical culture of human research in anesthesia (A Taiwan Acta Anesthesiologica Taiwanica-Ethics Review Task Force Report)

      2015, Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, inadequate ethics compliance was reported when the clinical research involved vulnerable participants, such as elderly people living in the nursing home,17 newborn,18 children,19–23 aging participants,24,25 stroke patients,26 studies involving emergency medicine,27 and genetic studies.28 The phenomenon of inadequate ethics reporting exists in almost all ranges of scientific disciplines, e.g., in oral and maxillofacial surgery research,29,30 cardiovascular research,31 critical care medicine,32,33 emergency medicine,27,34 human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS research,35,36 psychiatry,37 complementary and alternative medicine,38 dental research,39–42 physical therapy,43 surgery,44–46 dermatology,47 otolaryngology,48 nursing,49,50 epidemiology,51 Phase 3 oncology clinical trials,52 and anesthesia.53–56 Inadequate ethics reporting in the biomedical research journals is a near universal phenomenon, but perhaps more problematic in some developing countries.

    • Human subject research: Reporting ethics approval and informed consent in 3 chiropractic journals

      2011, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given that most biomedical research journals have established policies on the reporting of ethics approval and informed consent, researchers involved in studying journals have examined whether or not those journals follow their own policies, and as a result, a growing number of studies have examined ethics reporting in biomedical health sciences publication. One of the earliest, by Olson and Jobe,10 found that less than half of the articles published on resuscitation between 1966 and 1994 did not mention ethics board approval, and nearly 90% did not mention informed consent. The same year, Olde Rickert and colleagues11 looked at ethics reporting in aging research in 4 journals.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text