Review paperReporting approval by research ethics committees and subjects' consent in human resuscitation research
References (73)
- et al.
Epinephrine versus norepinephrine is prehospital ventricular fibrillation
Am J Cardiol
(1991) - et al.
Pre-hospital tracheal intubation versus esophageal gastric tube airway use: a prospective study
Am J Emerg Med
(1985) - et al.
Pre-hospital IAC-CPR versus standard CPR: Paramedic resuscitation of cardiac arrests
Am J Emerg Med
(1985) - et al.
Peripheral vs central circulation times during CPR: a pilot study
Ann Emerg Med
(1981) - et al.
Bretylium tosylate as initial treatment for cardiopulmonary arrest: randomized comparison with placebo
Ann Emerg Med
(1981) Systolic and mean arterial pressures during manual and mechanical CPR in humans
Ann Emerg Med
(1982)- et al.
Efficacy of pneumatic trousers in refractory prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest
Ann Emerg Med
(1983) - et al.
Prehospital use of dexamethasone in pulseless idioventricular rhythm
Ann Emerg Med
(1984) - et al.
A randomized comparison study of bretylium tosylate and lidocaine in resuscitation of patients from out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in a paramedic system
Ann Emerg Med
(1984) - et al.
Interposed abdominal compression CPR versus standard CPR in prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest: preliminary results
Ann Emerg Med
(1984)
Verapamil in the treatment of asystolic and pulseless idioventricular rhythm cardiopulmonary arrests: a preliminary report
Ann Emerg Med
Prehospital endotracheal tube airway or esophageal gastric tube airway: a critical comparison
Ann Emerg Med
Prehospital external cardiac pacing: a prospective, controlled clinical trial
Ann Emerg Med
A comparison of epinephrine and methoxamine for resuscitation from electromechanical dissociation in human beings
Ann Emerg Med
A comparison of interposed abdominal compression CPR and standard CPR by monitoring end-tidal PCO2
Ann Emerg Med
Randomized study of epinephrine versus methoxamine in prehospital ventricular fibrillation
Ann Emerg Med
A comparison of chest compressions between mechanical and manual CPR by monitoring endtidal PCO2 during human cardiac arrest
Ann Emerg Med
Esophageal gastric tube airway vs endotracheal tube in prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest
Chest
Ventilation with the esophageal tracheal combitube in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Promptness and effectiveness
Chest
Active compression-decompression resuscitation: analysis of transmitral flow and left ventricular volume by transesophageal echocardiography in humans. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Working Group
J Am Coll Cardiol
Comparison of endotracheal and peripheral intravenous adrenaline in cardiac arrest. Is the endotracheal route reliable?
Lancet
High-energy versus low-energy defibrillation: experience in patients (excluding those in the intensive care unit) at Mayo Clinic-affiliated hospitals
Clinical experience with three different defibrillators for resuscitation of out of hospital cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
Early defibrillation by emergency physicians or emergency medical technicians? A controlled, prospective multi-centre study
Resuscitation
A retrospective analysis of institutional review board and informed consent practices in EMS research
Ann Emerg Med
Perusing the literature: comparison of MEDLINE searching with a perinatal trials database
Controlled Clin Trials
The retrieval of randomized clinical trials in liver disease from the medical literature: a comparison of MEDLARS and manual methods
Controlled Clin Trials
The Belmont Report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of researdh
OPRR Reports
Research ethics committees
Recommendations guiding medical doctors in biomedical research involving human subjects
The Nuremberg Code
Cited by (31)
Contributory factors to the evolution of the concept and practice of informed consent in clinical research: A narrative review
2020, Contemporary Clinical Trials CommunicationsCitation Excerpt :In 1997, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), a group of medical and biomedical journals produced a report, advocating for a transparent publication policy regarding IC and ethical approval, and clear reporting where these have taken place [54]. Olson's review of cardiopulmonary studies from the MEDLINE database in 1996 found that only 26% addressed the issue of IC, however practice improved in more recent studies [55]. A later report of 60 randomly selected clinical trial reports from six leading medical journals published before and after 1997, showed an increase from 64% to 82% in describing IC, suggesting the indirect power of medical journals to influence researcher's practices [56].
Tiny tweaks, big changes: An alternative strategy to empower ethical culture of human research in anesthesia (A Taiwan Acta Anesthesiologica Taiwanica-Ethics Review Task Force Report)
2015, Acta Anaesthesiologica TaiwanicaCitation Excerpt :For example, inadequate ethics compliance was reported when the clinical research involved vulnerable participants, such as elderly people living in the nursing home,17 newborn,18 children,19–23 aging participants,24,25 stroke patients,26 studies involving emergency medicine,27 and genetic studies.28 The phenomenon of inadequate ethics reporting exists in almost all ranges of scientific disciplines, e.g., in oral and maxillofacial surgery research,29,30 cardiovascular research,31 critical care medicine,32,33 emergency medicine,27,34 human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS research,35,36 psychiatry,37 complementary and alternative medicine,38 dental research,39–42 physical therapy,43 surgery,44–46 dermatology,47 otolaryngology,48 nursing,49,50 epidemiology,51 Phase 3 oncology clinical trials,52 and anesthesia.53–56 Inadequate ethics reporting in the biomedical research journals is a near universal phenomenon, but perhaps more problematic in some developing countries.
Human subject research: Reporting ethics approval and informed consent in 3 chiropractic journals
2011, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological TherapeuticsCitation Excerpt :Given that most biomedical research journals have established policies on the reporting of ethics approval and informed consent, researchers involved in studying journals have examined whether or not those journals follow their own policies, and as a result, a growing number of studies have examined ethics reporting in biomedical health sciences publication. One of the earliest, by Olson and Jobe,10 found that less than half of the articles published on resuscitation between 1966 and 1994 did not mention ethics board approval, and nearly 90% did not mention informed consent. The same year, Olde Rickert and colleagues11 looked at ethics reporting in aging research in 4 journals.
Recommended guidelines for reviewing, reporting, and conducting research on in-hospital resuscitation: The in-hospital 'Utstein style'
1997, Annals of Emergency MedicineA Critical Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Ethical Protections in Medical Papers Published in Turkey
2022, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research EthicsEthical approval and informed consent reporting in ASEAN journals: a systematic review
2019, Current Medical Research and Opinion