Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 39, Issue 4, August 1994, Pages 507-518, IN1-IN2
Social Science & Medicine

‘Born to be a mother’: The cultural construction of risk in infertility treatment in the U.S.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90093-0Get rights and content

Abstract

As American society has become increasingly medicalized, biomedically shaped constructions of risk have begun to dominate traditional cultural constructions. This paper examines how the quest for a pregnancy affects the construction of risk by women in infertility treatment in the United States. Findings are based on a longitudinal, qualitative study with 275 persons (132 couples and 11 women) who experienced infertility. Because women's involvement in medical treatment was greater than that of men and because they were more intent on treatment, women assumed the role of final arbiter of what was a risk, and which risks to take. Women perceived more risks than men and were more willing to take risks than men. Notions of risk changed for both women and men, however, as they proceeded through medical treatment. This research suggests that once infertility is medically designated as a disease, both patients and practitioners pursue a ‘cure’ through a well-delineated pattern of medical treatment, despite the risks of such treatment and independent of the likelihood of success. When medical views of risk and responsibility are teamed with women's persistence in the pursuit of a pregnancy, medical treatment may be taken to extremes. Americans consider risk-taking to be their prerogative when personal histories reflect strong cultural mandates about norms, values, rights, and responsibilities, and these in turn are interpreted as health-related by both consumers and health professionals. As a consequence, the forces that trigger medicalization are activated and medical technology is given potentially limitless scope.

References (83)

  • D.C. Figge

    The tyranny of technology

    Am. Obstet. Gynecol.

    (1990)
  • A. Young

    The creation of medical knowledge: Some problems in interpretation

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1981)
  • J.F. Short

    The social fabric at risk: Toward the social transformation of risk analysis

    Am. Sociol. Rev.

    (1984)
  • U. Beck

    Risk Society

    (1992)
  • M. Douglas et al.

    Risk and Culture

    (1982)
  • M. Douglas

    Risk and Blame

    (1992)
  • H.M. Ginzburg

    Use and misuse of epidemiological data in the courtroom: Defining the limits of inferential and particularistic evidence in mass tort litigation

    Am. J. Law Med.

    (1986)
  • L. Forrow et al.

    Science, ethics, and the making of clinical decisions

    JAMA

    (1988)
  • K.L. Michaelson

    Childbirth in America: Anthropological Perspectives

    (1988)
  • M.R. Gullick

    Talking with patients about risk

    J. General Int. Med.

    (1988)
  • D.W. Brock et al.

    When competent patients make irrational choices

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1990)
  • D. Nelkin

    Communicating technological risk: The social construction of risk perception

    A. Rev. public Hlth

    (1989)
  • S. Lash et al.

    Introduction

  • H.V. Burst

    The influence of consumers on the birthing business

    Topics clin. Nurs.

    (1983)
  • K. Shrader-Frechette

    Producer risk, consumer risk, and assessing technological impacts

    Impact Assessment Bull.

    (1988)
  • E. Parsons et al.

    Lay constructions of genetic risk

    Sociol. Hlth Illness

    (1992)
  • M.L. Poland

    Ethical issues in the delivery of quality care to pregnant indigent women

  • L.M. Whiteford et al.

    New Approaches to Human Reproduction: Social and Ethical Dimensions

    (1989)
  • R.E. Davis-Floyd

    Obstetric training as a rite of passage

    Med. Anthropol. Q.

    (1987)
  • T. Lacqueur

    Orgasm, generation, and the politics of reproductive biology

  • E. Martin

    The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction

    (1987)
  • R. Wertz et al.

    Lying-In: A History of Childbirth in America

    (1979)
  • W.R. Arney

    Power and the Profession of Obstetrics

    (1982)
  • J.W. Leavitt

    The growth of medical authority: Technology and morals in turn-of-the-Century obstetrics

    Med. Anthropol. Q.

    (1987)
  • A.E. Clarke

    Controversy and the development of reproductive sciences

    Soc. Prob.

    (1990)
  • S.E. Bell

    The meaning of risk, choice, and responsibility for a DES Daughter

  • C. Luker

    Taking Chances: Abortion and the Decision Not to Contracept

    (1975)
  • M. Mintz

    At Any Cost: Corporate Greed. Women, and the Dalkon Shield

    (1985)
  • J.E. Bertin

    Women's health and women's rights: Reproductive health hazards in the workplace

  • M. Sandelowski et al.

    Amniocentesis in the context of infertility

    Hlth Care Women Int.

    (1991)
  • B.K. Rothman

    The Tentative Pregnancy: Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood

    (1986)
  • Cited by (71)

    • Quantifying fertility? Direct-to-consumer ovarian reserve testing and the new (in)fertility pipeline

      2020, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Tremellen and Savulescu (2014) argued that routine ovarian reserve screening may help “personalize” risk for age-related fertility decline and be a more effective tool for altering family planning decisions than more general education campaigns on age-related risk. As Becker and Nachtigall (1994) explored in their work on the cultural constructions of risk in infertility treatment in the US, being “at-risk” for infertility—or, in the case of early ovarian reserve testing, future infertility—is a danger to be avoided and a medical problem for which technological solutions should be granted limitless scope. Participants in this study viewed DTC ovarian reserve testing as an important means of investigating fertility status and took agency over the decision to access testing.

    • Perceptions of Environmental Risks to Fertility

      2015, Handbook of Fertility: Nutrition, Diet, Lifestyle and Reproductive Health
    • Infertility

      2013, Women and Health
    • Revisiting "her" infertility: Medicalized embodiment, self-identification and distress

      2012, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Greil et al.'s (1988) seminal work on the “his” and “hers” of infertility observed that women experienced spoiled identities regardless of whether they were personally diagnosed as infertile. Much of the research that has followed has also found that women are more directly affected by infertility than men (Becker & Nachtigall, 1994; Greil, 1991, 1997; Throsby & Gill, 2004), and are more likely to take responsibility for a couple's infertility (Nachtigall et al., 1992; Throsby & Gill, 2004). Yet Miall (1986) observed that women who are not personally diagnosed with infertility (e.g., male factor only) may have different experiences than those who are (e.g., female factor, couple factor).

    • Infertility

      2012, Women and Health, Second Edition
    • Gender, space and fear: A study of women's edgework

      2011, Emotion, Space and Society
      Citation Excerpt :

      Theorising edgework as performative enlivens a view of risk taking and gender as a politics of feeling involving subject agency, movement, corporeality and psychology. More, this perspective illuminates the recursive effect of gendered subjectivity and cultural inscriptions of risk through felt emotion (Becker and Nachtigall, 1994; Gustafson, 1998; Hannah-Moffat and O’Malley, 2007). Emotions have been the focus of work by others interested in women’s edgework.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text