The negotiation of death: Clinical decision making at the end of life

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(92)90021-HGet rights and content

Abstract

The ability of medical science to prolong biological life through the use of technology raises the question of how far physicians should go in treating the terminally ill patient. In clinical decision making involving the dying patient, physicians, patients and families bring various perceptions and interpretations to the situation. These different realities must be negotiated in order to define the meaning of the situation and the meaning of various medical technologies. The patient's demise becomes a negotiated death, a bargaining over how far medical technology should go in prolonging life or in prolonging death.

A case study of the process of ethical decision making in the forgoing of life-supporting therapy in an intensive care setting is presented and analyzed. The decision making process in this case follows a ‘cascade’ pattern rather than a controlled, reflective model. While ethicists view the withholding and withdrawing of life-supporting treatment as morally equivalent, physicians tend to make a distinction based on the perceived locus of moral responsibility for the patient's death. In the author's interpretation the moral responsibility for the patient's death by withdrawing treatment is shared with family members, while the moral responsibility for the patient's death by withholding treatment is displaced to the patient. The author suggests that an illusion of choice in medical decision making, as offered by the physician, begins a negotiation of meanings that allows a sharing of moral responsibility for medical failure and its eventual acceptance by patient, family and physician alike.

References (40)

  • S.H. Wanzer

    The physician's responsibility toward hopelessly ill patients

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1984)
  • D.S. Davis

    Slim just left town: decisionmaking on an intensive care unit

    Connecticut Law Rev.

    (1991)
  • JAMA

    (1988)

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1991)

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1991)
  • To suffer a prolonged illness or elect to die: a case study

    New York Times

    (December 16, 1984)
  • H.L. Lipton

    Do-not-resuscitate decisions in a community hospital

    JAMA

    (1986)
  • J.M. Luce et al.

    Withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients

    Chest

    (1988)
  • A. Meisel

    Hospital guidelines for deciding about life-sustaining treatment: dealing with health ‘limbo’

    Critical Care Med.

    (1986)
  • J.E. Ruark et al.

    Initiating and withdrawing life support. Principles and practice in adult medicine

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1988)
  • N.G. Smedira

    Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1990)
  • J.E. Zimmerman

    The use and implications of do not resuscitate orders in intensive care units

    JAMA

    (1986)
  • S.E. Bedell

    Do-not-resuscitate orders for critically ill patients in the hospital: how are they used and what is their impact?

    JAMA

    (1986)
  • S.J. Younger

    “Do not resuscitate” orders. Incidence and implications in a medical intensive care unit

    JAMA

    (1985)
  • N. Wray

    Withholding medical treatment from the severely demented patient

    Arch. Intern. Med.

    (1988)
  • T.L. Beauchamp et al.

    Principles of Biomedical Ethics

    (1989)
  • H.T. Engelhardt

    The Foundations of Bioethics

    (1986)
  • R.M. Zaner

    Ethics and the Clinical Encounter

    (1988)
    A.R. Jonsen et al.

    The Abuse of Casuistry

    (1988)
    Reich W. (Ed.) Experience as a Source of Bioethics....
  • L. Rosen

    The negotiation of reality: male-female relations in Sefrou, Morocco

  • J.S. Goodwin et al.

    Second thoughts: CPR

    J. Chronic Dis.

    (1985)
  • Cited by (76)

    • Rising to the medication's requirements: The experience of elderly cancer patients receiving palliative chemotherapy in the elective oncogeriatrics field

      2019, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although there are more and more social actors who take a position on life and death decisions (assisted suicide and euthanasia movements, organ donors associations, patient organizations), our societies have few answers to such questions of arbitrary reasoning around the limits of life-sustaining treatments and technologies. It still mainly remains the responsibility of physicians to invent the norms for when to treat and when to stop treating (Slomka, 1992; Kentish-Barnes, 2007). The medical fields relevant to elderly cancer patients “share” and “place” patients according to their physical and mental ability to receive chemotherapy.

    • U.S. Physicians' Opinions about Accommodating Religiously Based Requests for Continued Life-Sustaining Treatment

      2016, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      At times, families of critically ill patients request or insist that physicians continue life-sustaining treatment (LST) despite the physicians' judgment that a certain course of treatment is inappropriate1 or even clinically futile.2 As well, when physicians believe the likelihood of recovery is low, communication about risk and probabilities becomes its own hurdle.3,4 However, one of the biggest obstacles to successful end-of-life care is disagreements between the physician and the family over the plan of care.5

    • Institutional geographies in dying: Nurses' actions and observations on dying spaces inside and outside intensive care units

      2011, Health and Place
      Citation Excerpt :

      While it is probably the case that most people favor medical advancements, the actual day-to-day enactment of that knowledge in the context of an individual patient can render the patient a conglomerate of typographies, rather than a unified, embodied human being. Part of the body's fragmentation in the ICU serves the purpose of diffusing the responsibility for death which no one wants (Seymour, 2000, 2001; Slomka, 1992). The advancement of medical knowledge has resulted in a continual growth of specialties with a hierarchy of physicians involved in each specialty.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    An earlier draft of this paper, “The negotiation of death: conflicting meanings of end-of-life technologies”, was read at the 88th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C., 19 November 1989.

    View full text